Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
NCLAT rules that partial payment and ledger acknowledgment extend limitation period under Limitation Act, validating operational debt of Rs. 8.48 lakh against Indian Denim Limited.
NCLAT Delhi sets aside dismissal of Canara Bank’s Section 95 applications against personal guarantors, following Supreme Court ruling in Dilip B Jiwrajka on the role of resolution professionals under IBC.
NCLT Kochi held that application under section 7 for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against M/s. Inditrade Business Consultants Limited is admitted since financial debt and occurrence of default established.
NCLT Ahmedabad held that application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against Sumarrow Impex LLP (Corporate Debtor) admitted as financial debt and default stands proved.
NCLT Delhi held that application under section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiation of CIRP against M/s. Universal Journeys India Private Limited [Corporate Debtor] is admitted since existence of operational debt and default duly established.
NCLT Mumbai held that corporate debtor [Neptune Ventures and Developers Private Limited] shall be liquidated considering that CIRP period has expired and at present there is no resolution plan for consideration of the CoC.
NCLT Ahmedabad held that statutory demand notice duly signed by Operational Creditor and served upon Corporate Debtor through advocate is valid in eye of law. Accordingly, Corporate Debtor [Vimla Fuels and Metals Limited] is admitted to CIRP u/s. 9(5) of IBC.
NCLT Chennai held that discretionary power on NCLT u/s. 7(5)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cannot be used to impel financial creditor to consider settlement proposed by Corporate Debtor. Accordingly, CIRP against Aban Offshore Limited admitted.
NCLT Kolkata held that application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against Gupta Power Infrastructure Limited [Corporate Debtor] admitted for default of Rs. 2888 Crore.
IBBI’s Sixth Amendment Regulations, 2025, modify Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) rules, including omission of Regulation 39C and changes to Regulation 39D and Form H.
