Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
State could not blacklist a company after approval of a resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and that the new management could not be punished for the actions of the old management.
IBBI suspended RP Chandra Prakash Jain for six months for filing liquidation without compliance under CIRP Regulations 39B and 39C.
NCLAT Delhi held that application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] is duly admissible since default occurred subsequent to section 10A period. Accordingly, order upheld and appeal dismissed.
NCLT Mumbai held that application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] admissible since default of debt due and payable is established and default is in excess of minimum amount stipulated under IBC.
NCLAT allows CIRP withdrawal for SE Transstadia Pvt. Ltd. after Bank of Baroda and other lenders agree to a Gujarat government-backed revival and restructuring plan.
The new CIIRP aims to reform India’s insolvency laws. Learn about the proposed process, its goals, and the challenges it faces within India’s current legal framework.
NCLT rules that the IBC’s moratorium applies to all proceedings against a corporate debtor, including quasi-judicial and assessment proceedings, upholding its purpose as a protective shield.
This case study examines if a Managing Director can refuse to perform duties during Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and the suspension of the Board.
This case study examines the validity of a Resolution Professional’s actions under the IBC, 2016. It analyzes if an RP can convene a meeting based on a request from a CoC member with less than 33% voting rights and if a notice of less than 24 hours is legally permissible.
NCLT Delhi held that Fixed Deposit Receipts FDRs standing in the name of the Corporate Debtor constitute financial assets and form an integral part of the Corporate Debtors estate. Thus, resolution professional is directed to approach concerned bank and request defreezing of FDRs to ensure control over the same.
