CLB judgment

Sorry No Post Found

Lok Adalat Commences in Company Law Board

Company Law - To mitigate the hardship of small investors and to expedite disposal of cases pending before the Company Law Board the first ever Lok Adalat was successfully held at the Company Law Board, Mumbai Bench at Mumbai on 07-12-2013....

Read More

CLB Action Streamlines Notarial Malpractices in NCT Delhi

Company Law - ompany Law Board while passing an order in the matter of Shri Rupak Gupta & Others v. M/s. Banaras House Pvt. Limited has taken a very serious note of the serious breach of duty by Notaries in the capital while attesting affidavits (like affidavits having blank spaces, non disclosure of the identity of the person signing the affidavits, n...

Read More

Maytas to file review petition with CLB to induct four directors of Saudi Bin Ladin Group

Company Law - Maytas Infra on Thursday said it would file a review petition with the Company Law Board which recently rejected the company's proposal to induct four directors of Saudi Bin Ladin Group on its board. ...

Read More

Mahindra Satyam keeping its investors in dark over details of its performance

Company Law - Engineering and construction major Larsen &Toubro (L&T) is not happy with Mahindra Satyam (erstwhile Satyam Computer Services) for keeping its investors in the dark over details of its performance. Pune-based Tech Mahindra, the information technology arm of the Mahindra & Mahindra group, owns 42.67 per cent in the company....

Read More

Supreme Court dismissed plea challenging takeover of Satyam by Mahindra group

Company Law - The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petition challenging the Company Law Board's order facilitating takeover of the scam-tainted Satyam Computers by the Mahindra group and allowed the IT firm to go ahead with the process to rope in a strategic investor through a public auction. A Bench headed by Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan dismisse...

Read More
View More CLB judgment News

Non-transparent functioning amounts to oppression & mismanagement in affairs of company

Pravin Jain Vs Diastar Jewellery (P.) Ltd. (Company Law Board, Mumbai) - Non-transparent functioning of the R-I Company is evident from the correspondence produced by the petitioners who have been denied access to the statutory Records and the A/c books despite holding 52.94%, shares in the R-I Company. Huge amounts owed by Diastar Inc. USA to the R-I Company, admitte...

Read More

S. 397 pettition – Investors may either become members as per initial understanding or can receive back their investments

Aman Goel Vs EileenTech Communications (I) (P.) Ltd. (Delhi, Company Law Board) - CP No 18/07 stands disposed off in the above terms. All CAs stand disposed off. All interim orders stand vacated. No order as to cost. The B.O New Delhi, Bench to send a copy of this order to R-10 & R-11 at their new address at 207-Gaur Green Avenue, Abhay Khand-II, Indirapuram, Ghaziabad, U.P....

Read More

Resolution sent by shareholder to abuse process of law and to gain needless publicity for defamatory matter could not be published & circulated

Torrent Power Ltd. Vs Sureshchandra V. Parekh (Mumbai, Company Law Board) - It is noted that Shri Suresh Chandra V. Parekh and Smt. Nilaben S. Parekh jointly hold ten equity shares of Rs.100/- each under a common share certificate in HDFC Ltd. They requested for splitting of the said one share certificate into ten certificates of one share each. HDFC Ltd. acceded to their r...

Read More

ROC may ask company to make good the default in filing from No. 8

Royal Bank of Scotland N.V. (RBS) Vs Caohe Technologies (P.)Ltd. (Mumbai, Company Law Board) - In the instant case, the respondent-company failed to file Form No. 8 with the concerned RoC. Therefore, the RoC, is directed to exercise his powers under section 234(1) by calling information with regard to filing of Form No. 8 and direct the respondent-company to make good the default in non-filin...

Read More

A member can ask for inspection of Companies record any time after he became Member

Rajendra G. Patel Vs Sanghi Industries Ltd. (Chennai, Company Law Board) - The statute provides a right to the member or debenture-holder for inspection of the statutory registers and records as contemplated u/s 163 of the Act. The inspection is allowed to a member or debenture-holder without fee and any other person on payment of such sum as may be prescribed for each ins...

Read More
View More CLB judgment Judiciary

Govt. proposes merger of NSEL with FTIL

NA - The Central Government proposes to issue the following Order (presently in the Draft form) causing Amalgamation of National Spot Exchange Limited with its Holding Company Financial Technologies (India) Limited...

Read More
View More CLB judgment Notifications

Recent Posts in "CLB judgment"

Govt. proposes merger of NSEL with FTIL

NA - 

The Central Government proposes to issue the following Order (presently in the Draft form) causing Amalgamation of National Spot Exchange Limited with its Holding Company Financial Technologies (India) Limited...

Read More
Posted Under: Company Law | ,

Lok Adalat Commences in Company Law Board

To mitigate the hardship of small investors and to expedite disposal of cases pending before the Company Law Board the first ever Lok Adalat was successfully held at the Company Law Board, Mumbai Bench at Mumbai on 07-12-2013....

Read More
Posted Under: Company Law |

Non-transparent functioning amounts to oppression & mismanagement in affairs of company

Pravin Jain Vs Diastar Jewellery (P.) Ltd. (Company Law Board, Mumbai) - 

Non-transparent functioning of the R-I Company is evident from the correspondence produced by the petitioners who have been denied access to the statutory Records and the A/c books despite holding 52.94%, shares in the R-I Company. Huge amounts owed by Diastar Inc. USA to the R-I Company, admittedly a concern of R-2 & R-3, have been wr...

Read More
Posted Under: Company Law | |

S. 397 pettition – Investors may either become members as per initial understanding or can receive back their investments

Aman Goel Vs EileenTech Communications (I) (P.) Ltd. (Delhi, Company Law Board) - 

CP No 18/07 stands disposed off in the above terms. All CAs stand disposed off. All interim orders stand vacated. No order as to cost. The B.O New Delhi, Bench to send a copy of this order to R-10 & R-11 at their new address at 207-Gaur Green Avenue, Abhay Khand-II, Indirapuram, Ghaziabad, U.P....

Read More
Posted Under: Company Law | |

Resolution sent by shareholder to abuse process of law and to gain needless publicity for defamatory matter could not be published & circulated

Torrent Power Ltd. Vs Sureshchandra V. Parekh (Mumbai, Company Law Board) - 

It is noted that Shri Suresh Chandra V. Parekh and Smt. Nilaben S. Parekh jointly hold ten equity shares of Rs.100/- each under a common share certificate in HDFC Ltd. They requested for splitting of the said one share certificate into ten certificates of one share each. HDFC Ltd. acceded to their request and created 7 Folios for 7 shares...

Read More
Posted Under: Company Law | |

ROC may ask company to make good the default in filing from No. 8

Royal Bank of Scotland N.V. (RBS) Vs Caohe Technologies (P.)Ltd. (Mumbai, Company Law Board) - 

In the instant case, the respondent-company failed to file Form No. 8 with the concerned RoC. Therefore, the RoC, is directed to exercise his powers under section 234(1) by calling information with regard to filing of Form No. 8 and direct the respondent-company to make good the default in non-filing of e-form No. 8 under section 125. In ...

Read More
Posted Under: Company Law | |

A member can ask for inspection of Companies record any time after he became Member

Rajendra G. Patel Vs Sanghi Industries Ltd. (Chennai, Company Law Board) - 

The statute provides a right to the member or debenture-holder for inspection of the statutory registers and records as contemplated u/s 163 of the Act. The inspection is allowed to a member or debenture-holder without fee and any other person on payment of such sum as may be prescribed for each inspection. The member or debenture-holder ...

Read More
Posted Under: Company Law | |

Issue of shares to reduce shareholding of petitioner shareholder-company after removing its directors without any notice is per se oppressive

Daksha Infra Build (P.) Ltd. Vs Rochees Resorts (India) (P.) Ltd. (Delhi, Company Law Board) - 

The case of Chatterjee Petrochem (I) (P.) Ltd. v. Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. [2011] 110 SCL 107 is clearly distinguishable as in that case when the company was in dire need of funds the Chatterjee Group had failed to keep its promise of providing funds as it obtained a loan raising the debt equity ratio of the company. These circumstance...

Read More
Posted Under: Company Law | |

Member having shareholding less then stipulated in sec.188 cannot seek resolutions to be included for circulation

A plain reading of the provisions of Section 188 makes it amply clear that a member who intends getting his proposed resolutions included for circulation to members must have not less than one twentieth of the total voting power of all the members at the date of the requisition or must be not less than 100 members in number to exercise su...

Read More
Posted Under: Company Law |

If main petition is pending for adjudication, interim reliefs in the nature of main reliefs cannot be granted

Arun Amidwar Vs Grip Tight Packaging (India) (P.) Ltd. (Mumbai, Company Law Board) - 

In the present case the petitioner No. l was removed as director and this Bench presumes that the convening and holding of general meeting in which he was removed is legal and valid. So far as para 11.3 of the reliefs is concerned that the R1-company be directed to be operated only with the joint signature of the petitioner No.1 and resp...

Read More
Posted Under: Company Law | |
Page 1 of 3123

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (3,484)
Company Law (3,412)
Corporate Law (3,396)
Custom Duty (6,610)
DGFT (3,449)
Excise Duty (4,043)
Fema / RBI (3,252)
Finance (3,456)
Goods and Services Tax (4,583)
Income Tax (25,041)
SEBI (2,736)
Service Tax (3,282)

Latest Posts

  1. Every Majority Decision is Not ‘Cartelisation’: Delhi HC in Reliance Jio Vs. Others
  2. Service Tax under RCM on Senior Advocates Applicable from April 2016: Delhi HC
  3. Bengaluru GST Zone develops GST jurisdiction Finder App: CBEC Chairman
  4. Service Tax not payable on Financial Advisory Services provided by CRISIL prior to 16.08.2002
  5. Perfection And Excellence Is Lacking In Legal Profession: Delhi HC
  6. Profit increased due to disallowance U/s. 40(a)(ia) is eligible for deduction U/s. 10A
  7. Expenses not allowable on Failure to prove that it was incurred for business purpose
  8. How APMC Market traders can claim GST Exemption on Packed Branded Goods
  9. At registration stage of a charitable trust u/s 12AA CIT not required to look its activities
  10. Open letter to CBDT on restriction on use of Email & Mobile Number
View All Latest Posts

Popular Posts

  1. 3 Changes on Income Tax Website WEF 22nd September 2017
  2. CA’s created negative atmosphere to increase their remuneration- GST Commissioner
  3. Open Letter to PM related to income tax profile update on e-filing website
  4. Procedure for Cancellation of Provisional GST Registration with FAQs
  5. 20 things you must know about E – Way Bills in GST
  6. File SLP against HC Orders staying GST Collection: CBEC
  7. Advisory Note for claiming credit in TRAN 1
  8. Cosmic Astrology Forecast on GST Implementation
  9. TRAN-1 – A Complete Guide to filing of TRAN-1
  10. GST on Transport of Goods by Road Service other than GTA
View All Popular Posts

Search Posts by Date

September 2017
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930