Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
Certain clauses in Regulations 31A and 32 of the 2016 Liquidation Process Regulations were omitted to simplify compliance. The amendment applies prospectively to new liquidation cases, improving clarity for insolvency professionals.
NCLT Mumbai held that application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Process for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against Wind World (India) Infrastructure Private Limited [Corporate Debtor] admitted since Financial Creditors have proved existence of debt and default.
IBBI Regulations 32 & 32A for liquidation: defines asset sale modes and prioritizes selling the business as a going concern to maximize value and preserve operations.
NCLT Chennai directs initiation of liquidation proceedings under section 33 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code of the Corporate Debtor due to failure of implementing the resolution plan. Thus, the present application is allowed.
IBBI dismissed an RTI appeal seeking Committee of Creditors’ voting details, holding that such information is not accessible under RTI Act and is exempt under Section 8(d).
IBBI First Appellate Authority rejected an RTI appeal from a homebuyer seeking claim details in CIRP of Ansal Properties, holding that information lies with Resolution Professional, not Board.
Appellate Tribunal held that the NCLT’s order replacing the Resolution Professional suffered from procedural irregularity and violation of natural justice. Replacement under Section 27 of the I&B Code must be done only through a CoC resolution with 66% voting however, since the RP himself failed to place the agenda for replacement, he could not claim advantage of that lapse. Accordingly, the impugned order was quashed, and the NCLT was directed to follow due procedure under Section 27, ensuring fair opportunity and compliance with law.
NCLT Mumbai held that resolution plan submitted by M/s. Priyam Projects (I) Pvt. Ltd. [Successful Resolution Applicant] for M/s. Steadfast Shipping Private Limited [Corporate Debtor] meeting requirements of Section 30(2) of IBC and Regulations 37, 38, 38 (1A) and 39 (4) of the Regulations stands approved.
NCLT Jaipur held that conduct of the present Resolution Professional in CIRP proceeding of the Corporate Debtor [M/s U. N. Automobile Private Limited] seems to be non-transparent and in clear violation of the core objectives and principles of the Code.
The Honble Apex Court further held that the discretion of the Adjudicating Authority is circumscribed by Section 31 of the Code and is limited to scrutiny of the Resolution Plan as approved by the requisite percent of voting share of financial creditors.
