Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
Madras High Court held that no interpretation contrary to Section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [IBC] can be attributed to the expression ‘going concern sale’ as contemplated under Regulation 32 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016.
The NCLAT Delhi rules on the Puneet Resutra vs. J&K Bank case, clarifying that a one-time settlement with a guarantor does not extinguish the principal borrowers debt. The court upheld the initiation of insolvency proceedings.
NCLAT dismissed Liquidator’s appeal as premature, urging NCLT Ahmedabad to decide pending IAs by the successful auction purchaser without delay.
Analysing how moratorium under IBC affects arbitration proceedings and the legal ambiguity around continuation or initiation during insolvency resolution.
NCLAT Delhi held that possession of unit by virtue of section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act is not admissible in case the agreement to sell is unregistered. Accordingly, sale consideration paid is directed to be refunded.
NCLAT Delhi held that application for intervention filed under section 59(7) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [IBC] beyond the period of limitation of three years is time barred.
Supreme Court ruling on employee wages during CIRP: Only those who worked are eligible for CIRP costs. Provident, gratuity, and pension funds are excluded from liquidation estate.
NCLAT rules that a written financial contract is not essential to prove debt existence under IBC. Oral agreements, supported by financial records, can establish debt and default for CIRP initiation.
Overview of insolvency resolution for non-corporate MSMEs, detailing current IBC provisions, the Pre-packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (PPIRP) for corporate MSMEs, and international approaches to address non-corporate insolvencies.
The Satish Chander Verma case marks a shift in real estate insolvency, supporting mutual settlements and influencing IBBI’s 2025 regulatory amendments.
