Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 13 Results

MEIS benefit cannot be denied for mere inadvertent error

Case Name : Davinci Leather Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : WP No. 4192 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/02/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (5431) Madras High Court (454)

EOU & SEZs not eligible for ‘Vishesh Krishi Upaj Yojna’ benefit: SC

Case Name : Nola Ram Dulichand Dal Mills Vs Union of India & Ors. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 10636 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/02/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (1184)

No fundamental right to import and quantitative restrictions can be imposed

Case Name : Chailbihari Trading Pvt Ltd. Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7469 OF 2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/08/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (5431) Bombay High Court (995)

Proof of exports for fulfilment of EO – Absence of Bill of Export not fatal

Case Name : Forbes Marshall Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 8396 of 2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/08/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (5431) Bombay High Court (995)

Clubbing of Advance authorisations when not possible: HC explains

Case Name : Jindal Poly Film Ltd Vs Designated Authority & Anr. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : WP(C) No. 8202/2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/09/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (5431) Delhi High Court (1500)

Conditions rendering Advance Authorisation Scheme Nugatory are Unsustainable

Case Name : Messrs Maxim Tube Company Pvt Ltd. Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : R/Special Civil Application No. 14558 of 2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/02/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (5431) Gujarat High Court (523)

Indian subsidiaries of foreign companies can claim SFIS benefit

Case Name : Yum Restaurants (I) Pvt. Ltd Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 7011/2012 & CM 10056/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/01/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (5431) Delhi High Court (1500)

As per Import and Export Policy for the period 2009-2014 mport of second hand goods except capital goods is restricted and special import license is required

Case Name : Eastron Enterprises Inc. Vs Commissioner of Customs (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 721/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/02/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (5431) Delhi High Court (1500)

DEPB – Whether aluminium grills can be termed as Extruded aluminium products, and if so, Whether assessee can take benefit of Item 7 of Code 61 – No, rules SC

Case Name : Commissioner of Customs Vs. M/s. Caryaire Equipment India Pvt. Ltd. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : [Civil Appeal No. 6404 of 2003]
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/02/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (1184)

Licensing authorities have the power to amend the licence with retrospective effect- Bombay HC

Case Name : M/s. Bhilwara Spinners Ltd. V/s. Union of India, Customs and Anr. (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 9259 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/03/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (5431) Bombay High Court (995)