The Tribunal held that rejection of declared value without proof of inaccuracy was unjustified. Key takeaway: transaction value cannot be rejected without reasonable doubt and supporting evidence.
The issue involved additions based on alleged bogus purchases without VAT payment. The Tribunal remanded the matter pending the High Court’s decision on similar cases.
The Tribunal upheld TDS liability where tax was deducted only on part of the property value. It ruled that TDS must be applied on the entire consideration for immovable property transactions.
The issue involved denial of ITC without evaluating submitted documents. The Court directed authorities to reconsider objections with evidence of genuine transactions. The key takeaway is that authorities must examine taxpayer replies before issuing final decisions.
The issue involved alleged cyber fraud where funds were credited to the petitioner’s account. The Court granted relief considering absence of criminal history and willingness to return the money.
The Tribunal held that activities linked to micro-credit and welfare schemes do not negate charitable status in absence of profit motive. The ruling directs grant of 80G approval based on genuine charitable objectives.
The Tribunal held that penalty under Section 112(a) cannot be imposed without clear evidence of involvement or abetment. Key takeaway: mere allegations are insufficient.
The Court held that disputed issues and ongoing statutory proceedings cannot be challenged through a writ petition. It emphasized that proper remedies must be pursued before competent forums.
Tribunal held that non-compliance with earlier appellate directions requires fresh adjudication. Key takeaway: appellate authorities must follow binding instructions.
The Tribunal ruled that exemption under Section 11(2) should not be denied solely due to delayed filing of Form-10. It directed reconsideration where the form was available during assessment.
