Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
NCLT Mumbai rejected the application u/s. 30(6) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] seeking approval of resolution plan since the same didn’t meet all the criteria laid down in sub-section (2) of Section 30 of the Code read with Regulations 36A and 39 of the CIRP Regulations.
NCLAT Delhi held that Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] being a time bound matter, refiling delay in appeals is not condonable without any strong and credible reasons. Accordingly, application for condonation of delay in refiling appeal rejected.
NCLT Mumbai held that application u/s. 30(6) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for approval of resolution plan filed by resolution professional of M/s. Acme Realities Private Limited stands approved as Resolution Plan meets the requirements of the I & B Code and the IBBI Regulations.
The Allahabad High Court has nullified tax orders and demands against a company, ruling that all pre-existing claims are extinguished once a CIRP resolution plan is approved.
NCLT Mumbai admitted application u/s. 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] for initiating CIRP against Corporate Debtor since operational creditor duly established existence of operational debt and default.
NCLAT Delhi held that appellant as a personal guarantor, has been deliberately avoiding participation in the Section 95 proceedings. Accordingly, initiation of proceeding u/s. 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code against personal guarantor duly admitted by NCLT.
NCLT Mumbai held that application filed under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code by Financial Creditor for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against Corporate Debtor is admitted as debt and default thereof proved.
The NCLAT has set aside a Section 7 insolvency proceeding after the Corporate Debtor repaid the full pending amount, ruling that such proceedings are not valid once the debt is settled.
NCLT Mumbai admitted CIRP application filed u/s. 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code by operational creditor [Unisafe Fire Protection Specialists India Pvt. Ltd.] against Corporate Debtor [Digizone Technology Private Limited] since application is complete and default is proved.
The NCLT Mumbai has ruled that Section 14 of the IBC does not prevent banks from classifying a company’s account as fraud, even while the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) is pending. The tribunal dismissed a petition by the Resolution Professional of Rolta India.
