Filter Judiciary

Reset

Found 83 Results

Fish Oil – Ethyl Ester is classifiable under CETH 1516 1000 and not under 3824 9090

Case Name : M.K. Ashok Kumar Vs Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)

Appeal Number and Date of Judgement/Order are available only for members.

Related Assessment Year :

Courts : All CESTAT (4576) CESTAT Chennai (762)

Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Sugar invert syrup is not leviable to excise duty since department failed to prove its marketability

Case Name : Modern Bakers (Madras) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)

Appeal Number and Date of Judgement/Order are available only for members.

Related Assessment Year :

Courts : All CESTAT (4576) CESTAT Chennai (762)

Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Refund of education and SHE Cess in terms of exemption notification 56/2002-CE allowed

Case Name : Coromandel International Limited Vs Union of India (Jammu and Kashmir High Court)

Appeal Number and Date of Judgement/Order are available only for members.

Related Assessment Year :

Courts : All High Courts (19630) Jammu & Kashmir HC (81)

Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Date of surrender of bank guarantee considered as relevant date for refund u/s. 11B of Excise

Case Name : State Bank of India Vs Principal Commissioner of Central GST North Commissionerate (Karnataka High Court)

Appeal Number and Date of Judgement/Order are available only for members.

Related Assessment Year :

Courts : All High Courts (19630) Karnataka High Court (953)

Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Doctrine of substantial compliance could not override mandatory timelines for Excise Special Rebate

Case Name : Cent Ply Vs Commissioner CGST And CX Guwahati (Gauhati High Court)

Appeal Number and Date of Judgement/Order are available only for members.

Related Assessment Year :

Courts : All High Courts (19630) Guwahati High Court (251)

Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

CESTAT Mumbai Remands CENVAT Credit Eligibility Case of Hawkins Cookers

Case Name : Hawkins Cookers Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)

Appeal Number and Date of Judgement/Order are available only for members.

Related Assessment Year :

Courts : All CESTAT (4576) CESTAT Mumbai (616)

Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Containerising Gensets into Power Packs is Manufacture, Excise Duty Payable: SC

Case Name : Quippo Energy Ltd. Vs Commissioner Of Central Excise Ahmedabad – II (Supreme Court of India)

Appeal Number and Date of Judgement/Order are available only for members.

Related Assessment Year :

Courts : Supreme Court of India (2871)

Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Simultaneous appeal u/s. 35-G(2)(a) and application u/s. 35-C(2) not tenable: compost import for consuming judicial time

Case Name : Sanvijay Rolling And Engineering Ltd Vs Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise (Bombay High Court)

Appeal Number and Date of Judgement/Order are available only for members.

Related Assessment Year :

Courts : All High Courts (19630) Bombay High Court (2395)

Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Department is under statutory obligation to refund amount to Rayban Sun Optics with interest

Case Name : Rayban Sun Optics India Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (Rajasthan High Court)

Appeal Number and Date of Judgement/Order are available only for members.

Related Assessment Year :

Courts : All High Courts (19630) Rajasthan High Court (488)

Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Refund of CVD and SAD paid after Central Goods and Services Tax is granted

Case Name : JSW Steel Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)

Appeal Number and Date of Judgement/Order are available only for members.

Related Assessment Year :

Courts : All CESTAT (4576) CESTAT Mumbai (616)

Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Enter your email Address

Filter Judiciary

Fish Oil – Ethyl Ester is classifiable under CETH 1516 1000 and not under 3824 9090

Sugar invert syrup is not leviable to excise duty since department failed to prove its marketability

Refund of education and SHE Cess in terms of exemption notification 56/2002-CE allowed

Date of surrender of bank guarantee considered as relevant date for refund u/s. 11B of Excise

Doctrine of substantial compliance could not override mandatory timelines for Excise Special Rebate

CESTAT Mumbai Remands CENVAT Credit Eligibility Case of Hawkins Cookers

Containerising Gensets into Power Packs is Manufacture, Excise Duty Payable: SC

Simultaneous appeal u/s. 35-G(2)(a) and application u/s. 35-C(2) not tenable: compost import for consuming judicial time

Department is under statutory obligation to refund amount to Rayban Sun Optics with interest

Refund of CVD and SAD paid after Central Goods and Services Tax is granted

Latest Posts

HC Rejects Section 14A Disallowance Due to Absence of Exempt Income

Livestock Accounting: Principles, Presentation and Practice

HRA Deduction for Salaried Persons Under the New Tax Regime

Appeal Restored Due to Sufficient Cause Arising from Mismanagement Proceedings

Addition Deleted Because Property Purchases Were Proven as Stock-in-Trade, Not Unexplained Investment

Delay Condoned Because Temple Believed Income Was Exempt Under Section 10(23BBA)

Delay Explained by Technical Glitch Must Be Referred to CBDT for 80G Approval

Addition Deleted for Lack of Benchmarking: ITAT Rejects Arbitrary TP Adjustments

Appeal Dismissed Without Merits: ITAT Remands Case for Fresh Assessment

Understanding Income from Other Sources in Taxation

Enter your email Address

Filter Judiciary

Latest Posts

Subscribe to Our Daily Newsletter