Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 559 Results

Handwritten Serial Number cannot be the reason for denial of ITC

Case Name : Krupa Trading Company Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 11070 of 2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/03/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (933) CESTAT Ahmedabad (125)

Gujarat HC allows Rebate of Excise Duty to Petitioner in Cash instead of Cenvat Credit in post GST regime

Case Name : Thermax Limited vs Union Of India (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : Special Civil Application No. 11846 of 2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/02/2019
Related Assessment Year :

HC directs dept to consider petitioners claim for benefit under SVDLRS under Arrears Category

Case Name : Ramesh Electricals Vs Union of India (Karnataka High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. No. 52986/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/01/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (5431) Karnataka High Court (263)

TFM cannot be the determinative factor for classification of Soap

Case Name : Hindustan Unilever Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Ex. (CESTAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : Ex. Appeal No. 373 of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/01/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (933) CESTAT Kolkata (24)

CESTAT on Classification of articles of paper and printing industry

Case Name : Nagpur Business Forms Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 1733 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/09/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (933) CESTAT Mumbai (188)

Condonation of delay in filing appeal due to Financial crisis & Labour unrest justified

Case Name : United Tropican Veneers Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Cochin)
Appeal Number : ITA No.186/Coch/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/02/2020
Related Assessment Year : 2000-2001
Courts : All ITAT (6693) ITAT Cochin (117)

Casino vessels classifiable as ‘passenger ship’ and not as‘pleasure boats’

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Vijai Marine Services (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No: 86759 of 2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 1/11/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (933) CESTAT Mumbai (188)

‘Nimbooz’ cannot be classified as ‘Lemonade’ : CESTAT Chennai

Case Name : Ms. Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Excise Tax Appeal No. E/41318 of 2015-DB
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/12/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (933) CESTAT Chennai (131)

Cenvat credit allowable on HR / MS Flats, MS Coils used for manufacturing ships

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise And Service Tax Vs Pipavav Shipyard Limited (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : R/Tax Appeal No. 709 of 2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/02/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (5431) Gujarat High Court (523)

If Designated Committee not issues SVLDRS 3 within 30 days it is a case of deemed discharge

Case Name : Exotica Housing Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs, Goods and Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 51277 of 2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/02/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (933) CESTAT Delhi (301)