Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 505 Results

Toothbrushes supplied free with toothpaste cannot be valued U/s. 4A for excise

Case Name : M/s Contemporary Targett Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Vadodara-I (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 13657 of 2013-DB
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/05/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (809) CESTAT Ahmedabad (110)

Bagasse not a manufactured product- Allahabad HC quashes CBIC Circular

Case Name : M/s. Balrampur Chini Mills Ltd Vs Union of India (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : Misc. Bench No. 9854 of 2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/04/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (4810) Delhi High Court (1400)

Interest payable on differential duty payable due to retrospective price escalation

Case Name : M/s. Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (Supreme Court)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 2150 of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/05/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (1078)

FOC material supplied by service recipient should be included in gross works contract value

Case Name : M/s ABL Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (Supreme Court)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal Diary No. 41950 of 2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/12/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (1078)

Dharmada cannot be included in transaction value of goods: SC

Case Name : M/s D.J. Malpani Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik (Supreme Court of India) Civil Appeal No. 5282 of 2005
Appeal Number : 09/04/2019
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :

CESTAT expresses serious concern on communications to appellants citing Asian Resurfacing case

Case Name : Vijayanagar Sugars Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Misc. Order No: 20104-20106/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/03/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (809) CESTAT Bangalore (108)

Service Tax on Insurance policies taken for compliance under labour legislations- Cenvat Credit eligible

Case Name : Nelcast Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise  (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. E/41556/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/12/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (809) CESTAT Chennai (110)

ITC allowed on GTA services in case of FOR sale

Case Name : M/s Ultratech Cement Ltd. Vs C.C.E. Kutch (Gandhidham) (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. E/11098/2015-DB
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/02/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (809) CESTAT Ahmedabad (110)

Refund of excess duty paid cannot be denied on basis of not reassessing bill of entries

Case Name : Micromax  Informatics Limited Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court )
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 5751 of 2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/11/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (4810) Bombay High Court (892)

Cenvat Credit of Service Tax paid on Rent of Infrastructural Facilities allowable

Case Name : M/s Honda Motorcycle & Scooter Vs CCE & ST (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeals No. 50809, 50820-50821 of 2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/12/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (809) CESTAT Delhi (278)