Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 416 Results

CAAR Rejects Ruling on Roasted Areca Nut Classification Citing Madras HC Decision

Case Name : In re AZ Overeas (CAAR Delhi)
Appeal Number and Date of Judgement/Order are available only for members.
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings (4616) CAAR (534)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Samsung ‘Moving Style’ Classifiable as ‘Other Monitor’ Under CTH 8528: CAAR Delhi

Case Name : In re Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. (CAAR Delhi)
Appeal Number and Date of Judgement/Order are available only for members.
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings (4616) CAAR (534)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

TrackMan 4 & TrackMan iO Classifiable as Other Golf Equipment Under CTH 9506: CAAR Delhi

Case Name : In re K & A Golf Private Limited (CAAR Delhi)
Appeal Number and Date of Judgement/Order are available only for members.
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings (4616) CAAR (534)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Statutory Appeal Is Proper Remedy Against Customs Redemption Fine & Penalty: Madras HC

Case Name : Abdul Janeez Riasur Rahman Vs Commissioner of Customs (Appeal) (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number and Date of Judgement/Order are available only for members.
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (23314) Madras High Court (3140)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Royalty Addition to Import Value Set Aside as Not a Condition of Sale: CESTAT Chennai

Case Name : Valeo Friction Materials India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number and Date of Judgement/Order are available only for members.
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (5304) CESTAT Chennai (934)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Customs Valuation Upheld but EPCG Benefit Restored as Licence Remained Valid: CESTAT Chennai

Case Name : Mahindra Aerostructures Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number and Date of Judgement/Order are available only for members.
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (5304) CESTAT Chennai (934)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Customs Duty Demand Set Aside as EOU DTA Sales Followed HC Orders: CESTAT Delhi

Case Name : Abhishek Exports Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number and Date of Judgement/Order are available only for members.
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (5304) CESTAT Delhi (1246)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Used Garments Confiscation Sustained for No DGFT Licence: CESTAT Chennai

Case Name : Kayem Exim Private Limited Vs Eskay Enterprises (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number and Date of Judgement/Order are available only for members.
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (5304) CESTAT Chennai (934)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Processed Calcined Clay Not Classifiable Under Chapter 28: CESTAT Mumbai

Case Name : Omya India Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (NS-I) (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number and Date of Judgement/Order are available only for members.
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (5304) CESTAT Mumbai (702)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Confiscation of 1.75 Kg Gold Set Aside as Smuggling Not Proved: CESTAT Kolkata

Case Name : Dinesh Prasad Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number and Date of Judgement/Order are available only for members.
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (5304) CESTAT Kolkata (550)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031