Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 896 Results

No Service on Transfer of goods by hiring vessel

Case Name : Universal Dredging and Reclamation Corporation Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 42229 of 2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/06/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (964) CESTAT Chennai (134)

Know How’ is not IPR and not liable to service tax

Case Name : Modi-Mundipharma Beauty Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 50482 of 2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/06/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (964) CESTAT Delhi (310)

No ST on brokerage from overseas reinsurance even if amount received in Rupees

Case Name : Bharat Re-insurance Brokers Pvt. Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 1365 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/06/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (964) CESTAT Hyderabad (26)

HC instructs refund of Service Tax paid under Promoter with interest

Case Name : Team HR Services Private Ltd Vs Union of India & Anr (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 13114/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/06/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (5672) Delhi High Court (1546)

Sabka Vishwas Scheme Benefit can’t be rejected for mistake in Form SVLDRS-1

Case Name : Assam Cricket Association Vs Union of India (Gauhati High Court)
Appeal Number : Case No. WP(C) 2149/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/05/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (5672) Guwahati High Court (37)

Service by NSDL to depository participants liable to Service Tax

Case Name : National Securities Depository Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 87451 of 2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/06/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (964) CESTAT Mumbai (190)

No service tax on KIADB for discharging statutory function

Case Name : Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 1681 of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/06/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (964) CESTAT Bangalore (118)

CENVAT credit of service tax paid for insurance service received by banks from DICGC was available

Case Name : South Indian Bank Vs Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : ST Appeal No. 20747 of 2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/03/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (964) CESTAT Bangalore (118)

Refund can’t be rejected merely because registration number not mentioned in invoice

Case Name : Adani Enterprises Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad) ST No. 22 of 2010
Appeal Number : 04/06/2020
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (964) CESTAT Ahmedabad (133)

Electricity bill paid on behalf of client is not ‘Business Auxiliary Service’

Case Name : Ninan Jacob Associates Vs Commissioner Of Central Tax & Central Excise (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 25746 of 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/05/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (964) CESTAT Bangalore (118)