Service Tax : CESTAT rules that affiliation fees collected by universities are statutory functions, not taxable services. Service tax demand and...
CA, CS, CMA : A summary of key updates for Income Tax, GST, RBI, and legal matters issued from April 7-13, 2025, including exemptions, tax forms...
Service Tax : Understand the CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling in Vishal Tansukhbhai Gohel vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST. No service tax on freig...
Service Tax : CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling in Shakti Enterprise vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST clarifies that CHA's reimbursable expenses are...
Custom Duty : CESTAT, Allahabad penalizes Commissioner for delaying Tribunal order implementation. Rs. 2,00,000 penalty imposed, and contempt pr...
CA, CS, CMA : CESTAT e-Filing Software User Manual explains about New User Registration, User Home Page Navigation, Filing, (Petition/Appeal) ...
Goods and Services Tax : This is the fourth year since the introduction of GST in July, 2017. Despite a sizeable liquidation of appeals under the Sabka Vis...
Excise Duty : The Union Cabinet today gave its approval for setting up six additional Benches of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate T...
Service Tax : The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has directed JetLite (formerly Sahara Airlines Ltd) to pay Rs 100 crore (Rs 1...
Excise Duty : RECENTLY the President of India was pleased to discharge Hon'ble member of the CESTAT Mr. PK Das, just a day before he was to comp...
Service Tax : CESTAT Chandigarh held marketing support services to a Singapore entity were export of services, allowed refund with interest, and...
Service Tax : CESTAT Bangalore set aside service tax demands, holding software support services were Business Auxiliary Services and qualified a...
Service Tax : CESTAT Chandigarh set aside rejection of SEZ service tax refund claims, holding the one-year limitation under Finance Act notifica...
Service Tax : CESTAT Chandigarh set aside denial of ₹14.55 crore refund, holding BPO services were not intermediary services and qualified as ...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Kolkata allowed Rule 21 remission on 0.55% pig iron shortage, holding it was within the Board’s 2% condonable loss limit....
Custom Duty : Read Notification No. 02/2023 from CESTAT, New Delhi, introducing virtual hearings. Learn about the procedure, technical requireme...
Goods and Services Tax : Applications are being invited for 2 anticipated vacancies of Member (Technical) and 4 anticipated vacancies of Member (Judicial) ...
CA, CS, CMA : Representations have been received from the Bar Associations requesting for physical hearing of appeals. As there is improvement i...
Custom Duty : F No. 01(05)/Circular/CESTAT/2021 Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Block No. 2, R.K. Puram, New Delhi-11006...
Goods and Services Tax : Representations have been received from the Bar Associations at Mumbai, Bangalore, Ahmedabad, Chandigarh and Hyderabad Benches of ...
CESTAT Chandigarh held marketing support services to a Singapore entity were export of services, allowed refund with interest, and rejected Revenue appeals.
CESTAT Bangalore set aside service tax demands, holding software support services were Business Auxiliary Services and qualified as export of services.
CESTAT Chandigarh set aside rejection of SEZ service tax refund claims, holding the one-year limitation under Finance Act notifications inapplicable.
CESTAT Chandigarh set aside denial of ₹14.55 crore refund, holding BPO services were not intermediary services and qualified as export.
CESTAT Kolkata allowed Rule 21 remission on 0.55% pig iron shortage, holding it was within the Board’s 2% condonable loss limit.
CESTAT Chandigarh set aside the Rule 6(3) demand, holding barley husk is a waste residue and not a manufactured product.
CESTAT Chandigarh held the department could not re-open refund quantification after it attained finality and allowed both appeals.
CESTAT Allahabad restored the appeal, holding that “two months” and “one month” under Section 85(3A) mean calendar months, making the appeal timely.
CESTAT Chennai set aside the service tax demand after finding successor liability was unproved and the services were composite works contracts.
CESTAT Chennai held that an accepted VCES declaration could not be reopened after the prescribed period, while partly sustaining admitted reverse charge liability.
