Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
Regulation 2B details the process for compromise or arrangement during corporate liquidation, setting 90-day completion and 30-day filing deadlines. It excludes ineligible parties.
Understand liquidator fees under IBC Sections 34(8), 34(9), and Regulation 4, including CoC determination, default fee slabs, and IBBI clarifications on realization and distribution.
NCLAT upheld the dismissal of IBC proceedings against Kerala Medical Services Corporation, citing D.J. Laboratories’ material concealment of facts regarding pending disputes and a demand notice reply.
NCLAT Delhi held that application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiation of CIRP duly admissible since One-Time Settlement with guarantors didn’t amount to full and final satisfaction of loan vis-à-vis the Corporate Debtor.
The computation of the amount claimed in all three demand notices was never explained. It is quite apparent that while the guarantors in all the cases mentioned a limiting amount of the guarantor’s liability, the bank has simply demanded from them the amount of the loan outstanding in the principal borrower’s account.
NCLAT Delhi held that the capital investment under the reseller agreement lacks the essential ingredients of financial debt under Section 5(8) (f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Accordingly, dismissal of petition u/s. 7 for CIRP justified.
NCLAT Delhi held that direction of making contribution to the assets of Corporate Debtor upheld as person knowingly carried on the business of Corporate Debtor with intent to defraud creditors or for fraudulent purpose.
NCLAT Delhi held that section 238 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [IBC] cannot override the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 [PMLA]. Thus, attachment under PMLA cannot be undone merely because CIRP is ongoing.
IBBI’s First Appellate Authority dismisses Kairav Anil Trivedi’s RTI appeal for internal documents, citing previous information provision
IBBI dismisses RTI appeal, clarifies access under RTI Act is limited to information held or controlled by public authority, subject to statutory exemptions.
