Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions. This ensures improved transparency and accountability in the process.
The Court held that anonymous political donations infringe voters’ right to information. The ruling mandates full disclosure of funding sources.
The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out detailed steps for initiation, resolution planning, and timelines. The key takeaway is a time-bound framework designed to reduce delays in insolvency cases.
The framework permits liquidation only where the company has not defaulted on debts and can pay liabilities. It ensures a clean and fraud-free exit for solvent entities under a regulated process.
**SEO Description:** Supreme Court holds that an appeal filed by a suspended director in the name of the corporate debtor after admission of CIRP is not maintainable. It rules that such a fundamentally incompetent appeal cannot be cured or converted after expiry of limitation under Section 61(2) of the IBC, and sets aside NCLAT’s contrary approach.
The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory coverage and ensures uniform applicability of inspection and investigation provisions.
The issue addressed is ambiguity in authentication and evidentiary value of financial information in insolvency cases. The proposed changes clarify authentication timelines and make IU records reliable proof of default.
The proposal aligns grievance regulations with the newly introduced definition under the amended Code. It aims to ensure uniform applicability across all insolvency-related entities.
The amendments focus on better protection of creditor interests and structured insolvency processes. They introduce new mechanisms for asset transfer, claim verification, and resolution monitoring.
The amendment replaces rigid statutory documentation requirements with a flexible framework. This change empowers regulators while reducing compliance burden for applicants.
