Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
NCLT Delhi held that the default occurred after Section 10A of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [IBC], can very well be made a basis for an application under Section 7 of IBC, 2016. Accordingly, application for CIRP meeting requirement of the provisions of Sec. 7(3) & (5) of IBC is admitted.
IBBI’s First Appellate Authority dismissed an appeal seeking professional advice on Resolution Professional/AR roles in a Section 12A IBC proposal under the RTI Act.
IBBI disposes of RTI appeal by Manisha Mehta on complaint against resolution professional, confirming closure and prior communication to complainant.
IBBI suspends IP Shivkumar Baser for one year over lapses in CIRP and delay in liquidation filing during Ila Metals Pvt Ltd case.
NCLT Mumbai held that section 7 application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against Reliance Home Finance Limited [Corporate Debtor] admitted as default in repayment of debt exceeding Rs. 1 Crore established.
NCLT Mumbai allowed the Stakeholders Committee of Phalcomm Infra Solutions to replace the existing liquidator, appointing Mr. Manish Dawda in place of Mr. Uday Sakrikar, to streamline the liquidation process.
NCLT Allahabad held that application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against M/s. LDR Developers Private Limited [Corporate Debtor] admitted as debt and default proved.
A summary of an RTI appeal order regarding a request for an individual’s insolvency details. The IBBI directs the appellant to public records on the NCLT website.
The Appellate Authority clarified that IBBI does not maintain individual insolvency records, and applicants must access information directly through NCLT and other relevant portals.
Application filed by Canara Bank under Section 7 of the Code read with Rule 4(1) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 for initiating CIRP citing the default payment of a debt amount beyond Rs. 1 Crore as evident from the Form-C and Form-D of the NeSL certificate, from the loan account statement of S.S. Aluminium Private Limited, Corporate Debtor maintained by the Financial Creditor and from the acknowledgement of debt instrument executed by the Respondent was admitted.
