Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
Allahabad HC set aside lease cancellation order and directed Greater Noida Authority to restore plot, holding restoration vital for completing homebuyers’ project under IBC.
NCLAT set aside NCLT Kolkata’s order and held that ICICI Bank’s overdraft facility backed by fixed deposits constituted a valid security interest.
NCLT Mumbai found Section 10 petition complete, with no pending disciplinary issues against proposed IRP, and ordered commencement of CIRP for Comp-Print Kalpana Private Limited.
The NCLT Delhi directed liquidation of Auto Needs (India) Pvt. Ltd. under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the CoC, with 100% votes, found no viable resolution plan.
NCLT Delhi admitted R.J. Packwells Pvt. Ltd.’s application under Section 9 of the IBC against Maurya Printers for ₹2.20 crore default, declaring moratorium and appointing an IRP.
Gujarat High Court held that it would not be appropriate to invoke its extraordinary discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the present case involving possession and control of assets with corporate debtor during liquidation.
The NCLAT Delhi upheld the NCLT’s decision denying a suspended director access to discarded valuation reports of Winsome Yarns, clarifying that only CoC members are entitled to such documents.
The Supreme Court partially set aside the Enforcement Directorate’s attachment order, restoring properties to the resolution applicant for the benefit of genuine homebuyers while maintaining attachment over 11 identified units linked to alleged proceeds of crime.
The NCLAT dismissed Trinity Auto Components Ltd.’s appeal seeking enforcement of benefits under the BIFR scheme. The Tribunal held that the approved resolution plan under IBC replaced the earlier rehabilitation scheme, extinguishing all prior claims. It reiterated that no dual benefits can be claimed after IBC plan approval.
NCLT Kochi orders liquidation of the Corporate Debtor [M/s. Malayalam Vehicles India Pvt. Ltd.] as duly approved by CoC and Resolution Professional of Corporate Debtor appointed as Liquidator to carry out Liquidation Process as per the approval of CoC.
