Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
NCLT Mumbai held that resolution plan for Corporate Debtor as submitted by M/s. West End Investment and Finance Consultancy P. Ltd. is approved u/s. 31(1) of IBC since the same is duly approved by CoC and meets the requirements of IBC and the IBBI Regulations.
NCLT Mumbai held that non-payment of part of debt when it becomes due and payable amounts to default. Thus, application u/s. 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] duly admitted since there exists financial debt, exceeding threshold limit, and the same is in default.
NCLT Mumbai held that application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against Corporate Debtor [Vibrant Content Pvt. Ltd.] is admitted since debt and default stand established.
NCLT Ahmedabad held that application u/s. 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is admitted since Financial Creditor discharged its burden of proof by demonstrating the existence of a financial debt and default in payment of the financial debt by the Corporate Debtor [Devashray Papers (India) LLP].
IBBI seeks comments on draft templates for Prospective Resolution Applicants (PRAs) to disclose beneficial ownership and Section 32A eligibility, ensuring transparency in CIRP.
NCLAT Delhi held that initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process by admitting application u/s. 7 justifiable since application duly filed within 3 years of ‘Promise to Pay’ under section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Accordingly, appeal dismissed.
ITAT analyzes the conflict between IBC’s asset protection and PMLA’s confiscation power. Attachment must cease post-resolution plan, and the IBBI circular offers a path for asset restoration.
NCLT Delhi held that application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against M/s. Shriram Skill and Education Ltd. [Corporate Debtor] is admitted since debt and default duly proved. Accordingly, present appeal is allowed.
NCLT Kolkata held that application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against Haran Chandra Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. [Corporate Debtor] is admitted since financial debt and default is duly established.
NCLT Delhi held that application for initiation of liquidation of the Corporate Debtor filed under section 33(2) read with section 33(1)(b) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is allowed in view of non-cooperation of the management.
