Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
GSTAT rules on P&G’s anti-profiteering case, deciding the company is not required to pay interest on a profiteered amount of ₹6.88 lakhs. The interest clause was deemed prospective, not retrospective.
NCLT Kolkata held that application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against Shivam India Limited [Corporate Debtor] is admitted. Accordingly, writ petition allowed.
NCLT Delhi allowed liquidation of V.S. Matrix Pvt. Ltd. after CIRP expiry under Section 33(1)(a) of IBC. Resolution Professional’s extension application was dismissed.
NCLT Chennai held that as per section 128 of the Indian Contract Act, the liability of guarantor is coextensive with that of the Borrower. Accordingly, application u/s. 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code against Corporate Guarantor admitted.
NCLT Ahmedabad admitted CIRP application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code by Central Bank of India [Financial Creditor] against M/s. Repute Foods Pvt. Ltd. [Corporate Debtor] as debt and default established.
NCLT Kolkata held that financial creditors can file simultaneously two application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the principal borrower and corporate guarantor. Accordingly, CIRP application against corporate debtor allowed as debt and default proved.
The IBBI Disciplinary Committee suspended an Insolvency Professional for one year for improperly forfeiting an Earnest Money Deposit, exceeding the stipulated conditions.
NCLT Chennai held that application u/s. 7 of IBC against Corporate Debtor [Ran India Steels Private Limited] for initiation of CIRP admitted as financial debt is proved by the Financial Creditor and the ‘default’ having been committed by the Corporate Debtor.
NCLT Mumbai held that application u/s. 123 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiation of Bankruptcy Process against Personal Guarantor admitted as all the requirements of section 123 complied. Accordingly, Kapil Wadhawan [personal guarantor of DHFL] is declared Bankrupt.
NCLT Ahmedabad held that application u/s. 7(2) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process [CIRP] against Corporate Guarantor admitted as default duly proved.
