Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
NCLAT Chennai held that demand notice has been duly served on the personal guarantors and hence proceedings under section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 cannot be said to be vitiated. Accordingly, order quashed and proceedings remanded back.
NCLT Kochi held that application under Regulation 31A(11) of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 valid as Stakeholders’ Consultation Committee [SCC] with majority vote has resolved to replace the present liquidator.
IBBI advises IPs to seek restitution of ED-attached assets under PMLA, requiring a standard undertaking for Special Courts, ensuring asset usage controls and ED cooperation.
Bombay High Court held that order of District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission passed after imposition of moratorium u/s. 14 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cannot have binding effect of the company. Accordingly, petition is allowed.
NCLT Ahmedabad held that Corporate Debtor [Shree Ram Cottex Industries Pvt. Ltd.] is admitted into liquidation in terms of provisions of section 33(1)(b) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 in view of rejection of resolution plan u/s. 31(2) for non-compliance with statutory requirements.
NCLAT Delhi held that appellant doesn’t qualify as a Financial Creditor since appellant has failed to discharge the burden of proving any disbursement as defined under Section 5(8)(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Accordingly, order upheld and appeal dismissed.
The NCLAT Delhi set aside the NCLT order admitting Athena Constructions Ltd. to CIRP, finding the Appellant was not heard on merits. While the financial creditor’s dues were settled, the NCLAT remanded the case to the NCLT to process the settlement plea and consider any claims received by the IRP.
The NCLAT Delhi dismissed an appeal by LBF Publications Private Limited, challenging an NCLT order that rejected its Section 9 IBC application. The dismissal was due to an undue and unexplained delay of 389 days in the refiling of the appeal after defects were notified by the Registry.
NCLAT ruled that a registered agreement for sale alone does not transfer ownership and affirmed that property remains part of the liquidation estate.
Gujarat HC ruled that NCLT Delhi lacked authority to transfer matters from Ahmedabad to Mumbai under Rule 16 of NCLT Rules, 2016, terming such administrative transfers beyond territorial limits as illegal.
