Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
NCLT Ahmedabad held that application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against Synergy Food and Agro Processors Private Limited [Corporate Debtor] admitted as operational debt and default thereon is admitted.
The Orissa High Court dismissed a plea by a Managing Director to discharge himself from a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments NI Act, 1881, following his company’s entry into the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process CIRP under the IBC, 2016.
ITAT Delhi dismissed cross-appeals from the assessee and Revenue, citing the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The ruling reaffirms that Section 238 of the IBC has an overriding effect on the Income-tax Act, mandating all tax claims be lodged with the Resolution Professional.
NCLT Prayagraj held that liquidation of Corporate Debtor [Garvit Innovative Promoters Ltd.] in terms of application filed under section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code admitted as approved in 7th CoC meeting. Accordingly, the present application is allowed.
SC ruled that holders of Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares (CRPS) are investors, not creditors, affirming debt-equity distinction. Since CRPS is equity and redemption is conditional on profits, no ‘financial debt’ or ‘default’ under IBC exists, barring them from invoking Section 7.
Reverse CIRP, a judicial innovation, allows developers to fund project completion to protect homebuyers in insolvency, shifting focus from liquidation to home delivery.
NCLT Jaipur held that application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] of ACCIL Corporation Pvt. Ltd. [Corporate Debtor] admitted as debt and default stands duly established.
NCLT Mumbai held that application for liquidation of Corporate Debtor [Multicity Hospitals LLP] in terms of section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] is allowed as decided by members of CoC.
NCLT Mumbai held that Corporate Debtor Unitech Transformers Pvt. Ltd. is ordered to be liquidated in terms of provision of section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code as approved by members of CoC with 83.32% voting share.
NCLT Cuttack held that application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against Bhilai Jaypee Cement Limited [Corporate Debtor] is liable to be admitted since operational debt and default is proved.
