Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
Orissa High Court held that contractual dispute cannot be tainted with criminality. Accordingly, pre-arrest bail granted to the company liquidator [petitioner] since insolvency proceedings are pending before NCLT.
NCLT Mumbai held that initiation of liquidation of Corporate Debtor in terms of section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code admitted as members of CoC having 66.29% voting share approved resolution to initiate liquidation.
NCLT Mumbai held that application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code against Corporate Debtor [Quanteco World Limited] for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] is admissible since debt and default duly established.
IBBI First Appellate Authority denies RTI for Ajnara project data, citing Supreme Court ruling that public bodies are not obligated to create new info.
Supreme Court held that since the claim was filed, verified and informed to the Successful Resolution Applicant, the claim squarely falls within Clause 18.4(ii) read with Clause 18.4(vi)(a) of the Resolution Plan. Accordingly, possession of residential apartment is directed. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
NCLT Cuttack held that a pre-existing dispute cannot be a bar for admission of an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Accordingly, CIRP application against S.S. Aluminium Private Limited admitted as debt and default established.
Gujarat High Court stays a six-month suspension of an Insolvency Professional by IBBI, citing issues of bias and the lack of an appellate remedy.
NCLT Cuttack held that application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] admitted against Corporate Debtor [Fortune Spirit Limited] as debt and default in payment of debt duly proved.
The NCLAT Delhi reversed a lower court’s refusal to extend the CIRP for Torque Automotive, granting a 45-day final extension to allow the Committee of Creditors to finalize a resolution plan, prioritizing a corporate debtor’s revival over liquidation.
Corporate Debtor had defaulted in repayment of financial debt to the Applicant and such default was well over the minimum threshold of Rs. 1 crore, as prescribed u/s 4 of the Code. The application filed u/s 7 of the Code was complete and there were no disciplinary proceedings pending against the proposed resolution professional.
