Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
NCLT Mumbai held that section 7 application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against Reliance Home Finance Limited [Corporate Debtor] admitted as default in repayment of debt exceeding Rs. 1 Crore established.
NCLT Mumbai allowed the Stakeholders Committee of Phalcomm Infra Solutions to replace the existing liquidator, appointing Mr. Manish Dawda in place of Mr. Uday Sakrikar, to streamline the liquidation process.
NCLT Allahabad held that application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against M/s. LDR Developers Private Limited [Corporate Debtor] admitted as debt and default proved.
A summary of an RTI appeal order regarding a request for an individual’s insolvency details. The IBBI directs the appellant to public records on the NCLT website.
The Appellate Authority clarified that IBBI does not maintain individual insolvency records, and applicants must access information directly through NCLT and other relevant portals.
Application filed by Canara Bank under Section 7 of the Code read with Rule 4(1) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 for initiating CIRP citing the default payment of a debt amount beyond Rs. 1 Crore as evident from the Form-C and Form-D of the NeSL certificate, from the loan account statement of S.S. Aluminium Private Limited, Corporate Debtor maintained by the Financial Creditor and from the acknowledgement of debt instrument executed by the Respondent was admitted.
Supreme Court held that speculative investors cannot be permitted to trigger CIRP as this would undermine revival, destabilise projects, and prejudice genuine homebuyers. Accordingly, orders, setting aside admission of the Section 7 applications, stand affirmed.
NCLAT Delhi held that demand of EPFO raised on the basis of inspection report dated 10.05.2023 and assessment order dated 25.09.2023 which is subsequent to initiation of CIRP on 17.02.2023 cannot be sustained. Accordingly, appeal set aside.
NCLT Mumbai held that application u/s. 10 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code seeking own Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] is admitted as the Corporate Applicant is in default of a debt due. Accordingly, writ petition allowed.
NCLT Mumbai held that application u/s. 9 of IBC for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against M/s. Kute Sons Dairys Limited [Corporate Debtor] admitted as debt and default thereon established.
