Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
Delhi High Court grants revenue liberty to approach for revival of appeal against Amrapali Group. Full text of judgment/order available. ITA No. 646/2023.
Stay updated on IBBI’s latest circular reducing the waiting time between Limited Insolvency Examination and Valuation Examinations. Discover the enhanced flexibility for candidates.
Explore the Ministry of Corporate Affairs draft policy for pre-legislative consultation and a comprehensive review of rules and regulations, fostering transparency and stakeholder engagement.
Explore the NCLAT Delhi judgment on non-stamped documents affecting CIRP. Learn how it impacts the case of Hiren Meghji Bharani vs. Shankheshwar Properties Pvt. Ltd.
In a case involving Partha Sarathy Sarkar vs. Specified Undertaking of Unit Trust of India Ltd., NCLAT Delhi upholds the CoC decision on replacing the Resolution Professional.
Resolution Plan meet the requirements of Section 30(2) of the Code and Regulations 37, 38, 38 (1A) and 39 (4) of the Regulations. The Resolution Plan was not in contravention of any of the provisions of Section 29A of the Code and was in accordance with law. The same need to be approved.
DC finds that Mr. Vivek Raheja has contravened the provisions of the Code and Regulations made thereunder with respect to (i) suppression of relevant facts from CoC, (ii) examining financial capability of the Mr. Sushant Chhabra for meeting eligibility criteria of PRA, (iii) disposal of the assets of CD without the approval of CoC, and (iv) executing lease agreement with the PRA with respect to assets of CD without the approval of CoC.
Post approval of the resolution plan, any pending avoidance applications should be continued by the Assenting Financial Creditors or the erstwhile Resolution Professional as provided under Clause of the plan. The moratorium under Section 14 of the Code should cease to have effect from this date. Applicant should forthwith send a copy of this order to the CoC and the Resolution Applicant.
Statutory set off or insolvency set off was not applicable to Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC).
Get details on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India’s (IBBI) Phase 5 Valuation Examinations starting May 1, 2024, covering Land, Building, Plant, Machinery, and Financial Assets. Syllabus and format provided.
