Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
IBBI penalizes an Insolvency Professional (IP) for wrong interpretation of IBC provisions and charging excess fees. Details and implications.
Detailed analysis of NCLAT Chennai’s ruling in K Parthiban Rasu Vs Umiya Development Centre India Pvt. Ltd. & SBI case. Learn how it impacts insolvency law.
Comprehensive guide on Fresh Start Process under IBC. Learn about eligibility, procedure, and its benefits and limitations for debtors.
Supreme Court upheld the importance of proportionate and equal treatment for creditors in a class, emphasizing that the Resolution Plan should be feasible, viable, and just. The Court rejected the appellant’s plea for a higher amount based on the value of their security interest, underscoring the need for a rational and equitable resolution process that maximizes the value of the Corporate Debtor’s assets.
IBBI recently released a new circular that significantly impacts Insolvency Professional Entities (IPEs) in India. Change is rooted in ongoing efforts to improve effectiveness of corporate insolvency resolution processes.
NCLAT possesses inherent powers, as outlined in Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules, 2016, enabling them to recall a judgement in cases involving procedural errors.
Explore scope of judicial review in IBC as defined by Supreme Court. Learn how Adjudicating Authority’s role is limited to specific parameters, avoiding interference with commercial decisions.
NCLAT Delhi held that the First Schedule of IBBI (Insolvency Professionals) Regulations, 2016 provides that the Resolution Professional is expected to charge his fees in a transparent manner which should be a reasonable reflection of the works undertaken rather than maximizing their own personal benefits.
NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority rightly granted an extension of 90 days period after expiry of 300 days for fresh issuance of Form-G and completion of CIRP process.
NCLAT Delhi held that there is NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal) has jurisdiction to remit the plan for reconsidering the amendment which the Successful Resolution Applicant himself was requesting to be carried out.
