Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Corporate Law
  3. Judiciary

Resolution Plan Approved: Compliant with IBC Section 30(2) and Regulations 37, 38, 38(1A), 39(4), No Violation of Sec 29A

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kedar Parshuram Mulye Vs Navdurga Advisory Private Limited (NCLT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : IA No. 4409 of 2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/12/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : NCLT
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Kedar Parshuram Mulye Vs Navdurga Advisory Private Limited (NCLT Mumbai)

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Tags:

Kindly Refer to Privacy Policy & Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

Author Bio

Name: RATHI
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: N/A
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Member Since: 06 Feb 2019 | Total Posts: 807
View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Legal proceedings could not be instituted by CGST Dept on property of Corporate Debtor if liquidated by NCLT Assessee Must Prove Genuineness to Contest Section 68 Addition for Unexplained Cash Deposits During Demonetization Collection of cess by Agricultural Market Committee was not Tax but a fee for its services TDS order passed beyond four-year time limit u/s 201(1) was Invalid Reassessment Invalid Due to Six-Day Notice Period Under Section 148A(b) Instead of Required 7 Days View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored

Featured Posts

View All Featured Posts
Sponsored

Popular Posts

Search Post by Date
October 2024
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031