The Companies Act 2013 is a crucial legislation in India governing the incorporation, functioning, and management of companies. Learn about the key provisions, compliance requirements, and legal framework under the Companies Act 2013.
CA, CS, CMA : A comprehensive guide covering 175 legal compliances for July 2026 under FEMA, Income Tax, GST, SEBI, Companies Act, Labour Laws, ...
Company Law : The Companies Act, 2013 requires most companies to hold four Board Meetings annually, while OPCs, Small Companies, and Dormant Com...
Company Law : This guide provides a complete AGM compliance tracker covering pre-AGM, AGM-day, post-AGM, and IEPF obligations under the Companie...
Company Law : MCA has revised the Director KYC framework, requiring DIR-3 KYC (Web) only once every three financial years. The changes reduce co...
Company Law : Learn how the Companies Act, 2013 regulates managerial remuneration through profit-linked limits, approval requirements, and gover...
Company Law : MCA has cautioned stakeholders against phishing calls, WhatsApp messages, emails, fake websites, and ZIP attachments impersonating...
Company Law : ICSI has urged the Government to amend the law to allow Company Secretaries in Practice to appear before DRTs and DRATs. It argues...
Company Law : ICSI has urged the MCA to ensure eligible companies comply with Section 203 by appointing Whole-time Company Secretaries. The repr...
Corporate Law : NSO has launched the Annual Survey of Incorporated Services Sector Enterprises (ASISSE) to collect comprehensive economic and oper...
Company Law : ICSI has requested the MCA to grant compliance relaxations following technical disruptions caused by the Data Centre fire. The pro...
Company Law : Madhya Pradesh HC dismissed a winding up petition, holding that a bona fide dispute over liability required adjudication before th...
Company Law : NCLT retained the freeze on assets citing serious SFIO findings but ordered defreezing of the salary account and family members' a...
Corporate Law : The Court ruled that, without a transfer application and parallel insolvency proceedings, shifting a winding-up case to NCLT was u...
Company Law : NCLT permitted stakeholder meetings after accepting clarifications on forfeited warrants, disclosures, and scheme compliance under...
Company Law : The NCLAT held that CFO nominees must satisfy the eligibility requirements under Section 203 of the Companies Act. It set aside th...
Company Law : MCA has allowed companies to file Form DPT-3 for FY 2025-26 without additional fees until 31 July 2026 due to disruptions caused b...
Company Law : MCA notifies the New Development Bank under Section 2(11)(ii) of the Companies Act, 2013, specifying it as a body corporate for th...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a director after Form AOC-4 contained an incorrect AGM due date. The order emphasizes that directors are resp...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty after finding that an individual held two Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a Whole Time Director for filing Form DIR-12 with an incorrect CFO appointment date. The order reiterates tha...
NCLT Mumbai held that resolution plan of Unijules Life Sciences Limited [Corporate Debtor] as submitted by S.S. Fabricators & Manufacturers P. Ltd. [Successful Resolution Applicant] approved since it is duly approved by CoC and also meets requirement of Section 30(2) of the IBC.
The ROC penalised a company for issuing bonus shares without completing mandatory dematerialisation. The order highlights strict enforcement of Section 29 and Rule 9A compliance requirements.
The ROC penalised the company and officers for failing to dematerialise securities before issuing bonus shares, as required under Section 29 and Rule 9A. The ruling reinforces mandatory demat compliance for unlisted public companies.
Jayurance Healthcare and its officers were penalized under Section 12(8) of the Companies Act for non-compliance, emphasizing accountability and timely statutory adherence.
A company and its directors were penalized under Section 90(11) of the Companies Act for failing to issue notices to Significant Beneficial Owners, emphasizing regulatory accountability.
The ROC held that a one-day delay in filing Form PAS-3 violated Section 42(8), attracting penalty under Section 42(9). The company and its directors were collectively fined Rs. 500, apportioned individually.
Naturedge Beverages and its directors were penalized for misstating the number and dates of board meetings in the FY 2022-23 Directors Report.
Naturedge Beverages was penalized for failing to report three board meetings in the Annual Return, highlighting the need for accurate statutory compliance.
Naturedge Beverages and its officers were penalized for errors in board meeting dates in the annual return, emphasizing accurate statutory reporting.
The ROC penalised a company and its officers for keeping a rights issue open beyond the 30-day statutory period. The order reinforces strict compliance with timelines under Section 62(1)(a)(i).
