Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
The appellate authority held that RTI applies only to existing records. Authorities cannot be compelled to generate Action Taken Reports, analyses, or explanations not maintained in official records.
The appellate authority clarified that under the RTI framework, public authorities are only required to provide information already available on record and cannot be compelled to create or interpret data for applicants.
The Tribunal admitted the voluntary insolvency application after examining financial statements, bank records, and other documents showing continuing default. It held that the application was complete and complied with Section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
NCLT Mumbai admitted a Section 10 application after finding the company had defaulted on over ₹65 crore in financial and operational debt and was unable to repay its liabilities.
NCLT Chandigarh held that successive written acknowledgments by the borrower extended the limitation period under Section 18 of the Limitation Act. The tribunal admitted the Section 7 IBC petition as it was filed within the extended limitation period.
Liquidator, in discharge of duties under Section 35, was entitled to take custody and control of the assets of the Corporate Debtor forming part of the liquidation estate and recover outstanding dues.
The Tribunal admitted the insolvency petition after determining that the borrower failed to repay outstanding dues despite recall notice and partial payment. A moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC was declared.
SC held that creditors may initiate insolvency proceedings against both principal debtor and corporate guarantor simultaneously. Ruling confirms that co-extensive liability permits parallel CIRP under IBC.
The Supreme Court held that CIRP can run simultaneously against both a corporate debtor and its guarantor under the IBC, affirming the co-extensive liability principle.
NCLAT held that where the Guarantee Deed capped total liability at ₹75 lakhs in aggregate, the ₹1 crore threshold under Section 4 of IBC was not met. The Section 7 insolvency application was set aside for lack of jurisdiction.
