Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
The court held that after approval of a resolution plan, mesne profit claims cannot proceed against the company or its new management, though quantification may continue against erstwhile management.
The appellate tribunal held that once a company petition is dismissed in full, all interim and docket orders merge with the final judgment. No partial relief can be inferred from incidental observations after such dismissal.
The amendment requires every resolution plan to disclose ultimate beneficial owners and ownership structures. The key takeaway is enhanced transparency in insolvency resolution proceedings.
The High Court held that GST demands for periods prior to approval of a resolution plan cannot survive once the plan is sanctioned under the IBC. Past statutory dues not forming part of the plan stand extinguished and cannot be enforced.
The IBC legally ensures RP independence, but practical constraints like CoC-controlled fees and appointments often limit autonomy, affecting both perception and execution of duties.
IBBI has enabled modification of CIRP forms through its portal and announced fees for delayed filings. The late fee applies to forms submitted after 31 December 2025.
The Appellate Authority held that the change in corporate status was made to implement a subsisting NCLAT stay. Since the relevant Change Request Form was already disclosed, no further information was required under the RTI Act.
The Disciplinary Committee imposed a monetary penalty after finding repeated failure to cooperate with the Investigating Authority. The ruling underscores that cooperation with investigations is a mandatory statutory duty.
The authority held that the alleged age restriction for an examination arose from user-interface design, not from any rule or regulation, and found no RTI violation.
The issue was whether records relating to disciplinary action could be disclosed under RTI. The key takeaway is that information may be withheld if disclosure can impede ongoing proceedings.
