This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 66 of IBC ingredients proved as intention to defraud creditors established
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Rana Sarkar Vs Bimal Agarwal (NCLAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- NCLAT
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Rana Sarkar Vs Bimal Agarwal (NCLAT Delhi)
NCLAT Delhi held that intention to defraud creditors of Corporate Debtor was based on documentary evidence, accordingly, all the ingredients under section 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code are attracted. Thus, appeal lacks merits and hence dismissed.
Facts- The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the impugned order date 14.07.2022 passed by National Company Law Tribunal whereby the application moved under Section 66 of the Code was allowed and the appellant was...


