Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
The Tribunal admitted insolvency proceedings after finding the corporate debtor in default of ₹1.6 crore despite notices and opportunities for repayment.
NCLAT Delhi held that in terms of regulation 33(2)(d) of the Liquidation Process Regulations [LPR], liquidator is required to obtain prior permission of the Adjudicating Authority for conduct of private sale. Here, since prior permission is not obtained the same tantamount to an infraction of LPR.
NCLT Ahmedabad held that application under section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code against Corporate Debtor [Turnest Resources Private Limited] admitted since Financial Creditor has successfully established the existence of a financial debt and default committed by the Corporate Debtor.
NCLT Chennai held that application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor (Soundararaja Mills Limited) admitted as twin condition i.e. debt and default fulfilled.
NCLT Delhi held that application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against Corporate Debtor [Era Infrastructure (India) Ltd.] admitted since financial debt and default thereon duly proved.
NCLT Delhi held that application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against Haridwar Highway Project Limited [Corporate Debtor] admitted since financial debt and default thereon established.
The Tribunal admitted the insolvency plea under Section 7 of the IBC after finding financial default and compliance with RBI norms, initiating CIRP and declaring moratorium.
The Tribunal initiated CIRP proceedings after the borrower acknowledged the loan and default, confirming the existence of a financial debt under Section 7 of the IBC.
The Tribunal admitted an insolvency application after finding that the debtor failed to pay dues despite completion of consultancy services and no bona fide dispute existed.
A deep dive into the real-world challenges faced by liquidators post-IBBI amendments — from tight SCC deadlines to complex reporting and valuation hurdles.
