Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
IBBI Disciplinary Committee has issued an order addressing the contravention by Mr. Raj Kumar Ralhan, an Insolvency Professional. The order pertains to violations under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and related regulations, including the incurrence of unreasonable costs during liquidation and the failure to make necessary disclosures regarding engaged professionals. The IBBI Disciplinary Committee’s order […]
On the date of approval of Resolution Plan by Adjudicating Authority, all such claims which are not a part of Resolution Plan, shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect to a claim which is not a part of the Resolution Plan.
Law is well-settled that with the finalization of insolvency resolution plan and the approval thereof by the NCLT, all dues of creditors, Corporate, Statutory and others stand extinguished and no demand can be raised for the period prior to the specified date.
NCLAT Chennai held that condonation in filing of claim under Form-C based on bald explanation without sufficient cause for the delay is not allowable.
NCLAT held that that the Adjudicating Authority rightly rejected the Resolution plan as the same didn’t complied with the provisions of Section 29A(G) read with Section 240A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Detailed review of NCLAT judgment in H S Oberoi Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. Vs Inderjit Singh & Anr., highlighting importance of principle of natural justice in passing orders
Navigate the process of filing a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as a Financial Creditor. This step-by-step guide covers eligibility criteria, necessary forms, documents, and actions taken by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). Understand the requirements for joint applications, nomination of a person, and details to be furnished with the CIRP application. Ensure a smooth initiation of the resolution process by following the comprehensive procedures outlined in this guide.
On and from the date the application for the start of CIRP is filed, there will be an extra interim moratorium on FSPs. The temporary ban will last until the application is approved or denied. The moratorium outlined in Section 14 of the Code shall be in effect following the Adjudicating Authority’s admission of the CIRP application’s initiation.
Opportunity for Public Equity Shareholders after CIRP: A Measure for Protection or Myopia? Explore the proposed framework by SEBI to allow public equity shareholders in listed companies undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) to acquire shares in the resultant entity.
Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) enables a Financial Creditor (FC) to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a Corporate Debtor when a default on a debt has occurred.
