Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
Once the Resolution plan has been approved by the Hon’ble NCLT pursuant to section 31 of IBC Code, 2016 then new management i.e. Resolution Applicant is in charge of control of the corporate debtor from the date of approval of the Resolution Plan.
How Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and SARFEASI are impacting in recovery of stressed assets? General idea, we all possess is that the role of ARC, established under SARFEASI to primarily resolve the issue of NPA/Bad Loan.
Numerous appeals IBC get rejected by NCLAT on the grounds of them being time-barred. NCLAT articulates that it lacks the power to allow appeals filed after 45 days from the ‘date of the order’ of the Adjudicating Authority.
Mr. Anurag Kumar Sinha has erred in his judgement in placing a noncompliant resolution plan for the consideration of the CoC. Further, despite being noncompliant plan, it was passed and placed for AA’s approval. AA has strongly commented on the issue in its judgement pointing out the mistake of the resolution professional and the CoC […]
Stay up to date with the latest case law related to IBC in October, November and December 2022. Supreme Court finds OCs cannot enforce CIRP prematurely. AA must investigate plausible disputes, not feeble arguments.
IBC was designed to overhaul India’s outdated insolvency and bankruptcy laws and to provide a more efficient & effective system for resolving insolvency.
The DC notes that Mr. Viswanathan Sankaran was present before the AA on 17.09.2021 while order for conducting CoC meeting by next week was passed. Hence it may be said that he was aware of direction by the AA. The DC further notes that representative of Canara Bank vide email dated 07.10.2021 requested to prepone […]
Explore Reverse CIRP in Real Estate: No provision in IBC, Umang Realtech case introduction, non-precedent status, challenges, and recent project-wise resolutions in Supertech & Ansal Properties cases.
When a company goes through insolvency proceedings, public equity shareholders (non-promoter public shareholders) are the ones that profit least since they are not considered creditors who are protected by IBC 2016
NCLAT Delhi held that withdrawal application under section 12A of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 unsustainable once CoC (Committee of Creditors) approves a resolution plan.
