Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
IBBI recently released a new circular that significantly impacts Insolvency Professional Entities (IPEs) in India. Change is rooted in ongoing efforts to improve effectiveness of corporate insolvency resolution processes.
NCLAT possesses inherent powers, as outlined in Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules, 2016, enabling them to recall a judgement in cases involving procedural errors.
Explore scope of judicial review in IBC as defined by Supreme Court. Learn how Adjudicating Authority’s role is limited to specific parameters, avoiding interference with commercial decisions.
NCLAT Delhi held that the First Schedule of IBBI (Insolvency Professionals) Regulations, 2016 provides that the Resolution Professional is expected to charge his fees in a transparent manner which should be a reasonable reflection of the works undertaken rather than maximizing their own personal benefits.
NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority rightly granted an extension of 90 days period after expiry of 300 days for fresh issuance of Form-G and completion of CIRP process.
NCLAT Delhi held that there is NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal) has jurisdiction to remit the plan for reconsidering the amendment which the Successful Resolution Applicant himself was requesting to be carried out.
NCLAT Delhi held that operational creditor can initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a Corporate Debtor only in clear cases where no real dispute exists between the two parties.
An analysis of the Supreme Court ruling which positions homebuyers as financial creditors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, its implications, and history.
NCLAT rules in favor of Tata Power, stating no arrears payment needed before the date of Resolution Plan approval against Jagannath Sponge Pvt Ltd.
NCLAT Chennai dismisses Kotak Mahindra Bank’s appeal in the Orchid Pharma case, affirming limited authority post approval of resolution plan. Analysis and conclusion provided.
