Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
Explore Supreme Court’s recent ruling on Section 66 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, highlighting its limitations in providing remedies against third parties.
Read full text of NCLAT Chennai order in case of Malavika Hegde vs. IndusInd Bank, where a settlement led to termination of CIRP proceedings.
NCLT Ahmedabad approved the resolution plan submitted by M/s. GCCL Infrastructure and Projects Limited (Corporate Debtor) as resolution plan has provisions of its effective implementation.
NCLAT Chennai held that any kind of settlement is between the Parties and no settlement can be directed by way of an Order under the Provisions of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC, 2016).
DC notes that Mr. Partha Sarathy Sarkar has conducted the entire CIRP of the CD in a brazen manner without having due regard the provisions of the Code and the regulations made thereunder. Keeping in view the grave nature of contraventions as detailed above, three years suspension is fully justified.
GST and Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code have almost a contemporary beginning. GST Laws (as also other tax laws) are being synced with IBC. Nevertheless, overriding effect of IBC over other laws is obvious.
IBBI penalizes an Insolvency Professional (IP) for wrong interpretation of IBC provisions and charging excess fees. Details and implications.
Detailed analysis of NCLAT Chennai’s ruling in K Parthiban Rasu Vs Umiya Development Centre India Pvt. Ltd. & SBI case. Learn how it impacts insolvency law.
Comprehensive guide on Fresh Start Process under IBC. Learn about eligibility, procedure, and its benefits and limitations for debtors.
Supreme Court upheld the importance of proportionate and equal treatment for creditors in a class, emphasizing that the Resolution Plan should be feasible, viable, and just. The Court rejected the appellant’s plea for a higher amount based on the value of their security interest, underscoring the need for a rational and equitable resolution process that maximizes the value of the Corporate Debtor’s assets.
