Stay updated on custom duty notifications for changes in import/export regulations, tariffs, and trade facilitation measures. Get the latest updates on duty exemptions, preferential trade agreements, and compliance requirements through custom duty notifications.
Custom Duty : The article explains how the MOOWR Scheme allows manufacturers to defer customs duty and IGST while detailing eligibility, complia...
Custom Duty : Anti-dumping duty protects local manufacturers from unfairly cheap imports that can damage domestic markets. The article explains ...
Custom Duty : The article argues that the sharp increase in gold import duty was triggered by pressure on India’s forex reserves, rising oil p...
Custom Duty : Emergency customs relaxations introduced during the maritime crisis expire on 30 April 2026, leaving exporters uncertain. The fram...
Custom Duty : Highlights how the EMI Scheme allows businesses to defer duty payments, easing working capital pressure while improving operationa...
Custom Duty : The Government has extended the full customs duty exemption on critical petrochemical imports until 15 July 2026 because of contin...
Custom Duty : The India–Oman Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement became operational on 1 June 2026 after completion of required proce...
Custom Duty : CBIC has allowed Eligible Manufacturer Importers to avail deferred payment of customs duty from 1 April 2026. The circular outline...
Custom Duty : The new rules enhance duty-free allowances and introduce digital declarations. The overhaul aims to speed up clearance and improve...
Custom Duty : New baggage rules and processing regulations are notified, replacing earlier frameworks and aligning customs procedures for passen...
Custom Duty : CAAR classified complete prosthetic joints as artificial joints and held the imported implants ineligible for exemption under Noti...
Custom Duty : CAAR held ITC (HS) code matching is not mandatory for DFIA imports if goods match DFIA description and satisfy Notification 25/202...
Custom Duty : CAAR ruled that matching ITC (HS) codes is unnecessary if imported goods match the DFIA description and comply with quantity and v...
Custom Duty : CAAR held that exported resultant goods qualify for proportionate duty remission under the MOOWR framework despite domestic sale o...
Custom Duty : CAAR ruled complete filtration assemblies with integrated components are classifiable as parts of filtering machinery under CTH 84...
Custom Duty : CBIC has introduced a uniform Deficiency Memo format for Section 74 drawback claims, standardizing document requirements and claim...
Custom Duty : CBIC has directed provisional assessment of imports of Glufosinate and its salt from China pending the anti-absorption review. Imp...
Custom Duty : CBIC has directed provisional assessment of Insoluble Sulphur imports from China while the anti-absorption review remains pending....
Custom Duty : CBIC has clarified that drawback under Section 74 and refund under Section 27 cannot be paid in cash where import duty was dischar...
Custom Duty : CBIC notifies India-UK trade agreement origin rules from 15 July 2026, prescribing origin criteria, QVC tests and preferential tar...
Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 96/2004-Customs, dated the 17th September, 2004 namely.
It has been brought to the notice of Board that even though, the exporters have been exempted from declaration in GR/SDF/PP/Softex forms for export value upto US $ 25,000 as per RBI’s A.P.(DIR Series) Circular No.61 dated January 31, 2004, it is reported that some Custom offices still insist on submission for declaration.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (i) of clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No.18/2005-NT-Customs, dated the 23rd February, 2005 [S.O.247(E), dated the 23rd February, 2005], the Board hereby determines for the purposes of said section relating to export goods, that the rate of exchange of conversion of each of the foreign currency specified in column (2) of each of Schedule I and Schedule II appended hereto into Indian currency or vice versa shall, with effect from the 1st April, 2005.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (i) of clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 14 of Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No.17/2005-NT-Customs, dated the 23rd February, 2005 [S.O.248(E) dated the 23rd February, 2005], the Board hereby determines for the purposes of said section, relating to imported goods, that the rate of exchange of conversion of each of the foreign currency specified in column (2) of each of Schedule I and Schedule II appended hereto into Indian currency or vice versa shall, with effect from the 1st April, 2005.
The undersigned is directed to invite attention to Board’s Circular No.58/2004-Cus. dated 21.10.2004 on the above subject and to say that a doubt has been raised as to whether a Surety is to be furnished alongwith Bond in the case of imports by Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc. {vide para 3.1(a) to (e)} under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes. It has been represented that since established exporters, Star Export Houses and Public Sector Undertakings have large volume of imports under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes, it becomes difficult for them in arranging Sureties by another firm or person for each & every import. Besides, it adds to transaction cost. It has, therefore, been requested that the requirement of Surety for execution of Bond under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes should be dispensed with in the case of Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc., as available earlier under Circular No.79/2003-Cus. dated 4.9.2003 (since superceded). The undersigned is directed to invite attention to Board’s Circular No.58/2004-Cus. dated 21.10.2004 on the above subject and to say that a doubt has been raised as to whether a Surety is to be furnished alongwith Bond in the case of imports by Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc. {vide para 3.1(a) to (e)} under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes. It has been represented that since established exporters, Star Export Houses and Public Sector Undertakings have large volume of imports under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes, it becomes difficult for them in arranging Sureties by another firm or person for each & every import. Besides, it adds to transaction cost. It has, therefore, been requested that the requirement of Surety for execution of Bond under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes should be dispensed with in the case of Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc., as available earlier under Circular No.79/2003-Cus. dated 4.9.2003 (since superceded). The undersigned is directed to invite attention to Board’s Circular No.58/2004-Cus. dated 21.10.2004 on the above subject and to say that a doubt has been raised as to whether a Surety is to be furnished alongwith Bond in the case of imports by Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc. {vide para 3.1(a) to (e)} under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes. It has been represented that since established exporters, Star Export Houses and Public Sector Undertakings have large volume of imports under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes, it becomes difficult for them in arranging Sureties by another firm or person for each & every import. Besides, it adds to transaction cost. It has, therefore, been requested that the requirement of Surety for execution of Bond under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes should be dispensed with in the case of Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc., as available earlier under Circular No.79/2003-Cus. dated 4.9.2003 (since superceded). The undersigned is directed to invite attention to Board’s Circular No.58/2004-Cus. dated 21.10.2004 on the above subject and to say that a doubt has been raised as to whether a Surety is to be furnished alongwith Bond in the case of imports by Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc. {vide para 3.1(a) to (e)} under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes. It has been represented that since established exporters, Star Export Houses and Public Sector Undertakings have large volume of imports under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes, it becomes difficult for them in arranging Sureties by another firm or person for each & every import. Besides, it adds to transaction cost. It has, therefore, been requested that the requirement of Surety for execution of Bond under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes should be dispensed with in the case of Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc., as available earlier under Circular No.79/2003-Cus. dated 4.9.2003 (since superceded). The undersigned is directed to invite attention to Board’s Circular No.58/2004-Cus. dated 21.10.2004 on the above subject and to say that a doubt has been raised as to whether a Surety is to be furnished alongwith Bond in the case of imports by Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc. {vide para 3.1(a) to (e)} under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes. It has been represented that since established exporters, Star Export Houses and Public Sector Undertakings have large volume of imports under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes, it becomes difficult for them in arranging Sureties by another firm or person for each & every import. Besides, it adds to transaction cost. It has, therefore, been requested that the requirement of Surety for execution of Bond under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes should be dispensed with in the case of Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc., as available earlier under Circular No.79/2003-Cus. dated 4.9.2003 (since superceded). The undersigned is directed to invite attention to Board’s Circular No.58/2004-Cus. dated 21.10.2004 on the above subject and to say that a doubt has been raised as to whether a Surety is to be furnished alongwith Bond in the case of imports by Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc. {vide para 3.1(a) to (e)} under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes. It has been represented that since established exporters, Star Export Houses and Public Sector Undertakings have large volume of imports under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes, it becomes difficult for them in arranging Sureties by another firm or person for each & every import. Besides, it adds to transaction cost. It has, therefore, been requested that the requirement of Surety for execution of Bond under Advance Licence and EPCG Schemes should be dispensed with in the case of Star Export Houses, Public Sector Undertakings etc., as available earlier under Circular No.79/2003-Cus. dated 4.9.2003 (since superceded).
Therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1), read with sub-section (5) of section 9A of the said Customs Tariff Act, and rules 18 and 20 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995.
I am directed to invite your attention to the above subject and to say that a doubt has been raised as to whether the All Industry Rate of duty drawback is to be denied / reduced on export goods using inputs some of which are non-duty paid. It has been represented that the All Industry Rate of duty drawback is sought to be denied / reduced on floor coverings and made ups on the ground that a part of yarn used has not suffered any duty.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962, (52 of 1962), the Board, being satisfied that it is necessary and expedient so to do, hereby makes the following further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No.36/2001-Cus (N.T.), dated, the 3rd August 2001, namely.
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub section (1) of section 7 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby makes the following further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, No. 62/94-CUSTOMS (N.T.), dated the 21st November, 1994, namely.
It has been brought to the notice of the Board that after the issuance of Let Export Order (LEO) and before goods are actually loaded in the Aircraft, Airlines seeks permission twice from Customs once for palletisation and other at the time of actual loading for e.g. Delhi Airport. It is felt that when the palletisation is done after the Let Export Order then there is no need for a separate permission from Customs for palletisation.
