Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Neeta Choudhary Vs ITO (ITAT Indore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Neeta Choudhary Vs ITO (ITAT Indore)

The Indore Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2017-18 and deleted the addition of ₹5 lakh made under section 68 read with section 115BBE in respect of an unsecured loan. The Tribunal observed that the Assessing Officer had inconsistently accepted nine subsequent loan transactions aggregating to ₹3.35 lakh from the same lender while treating only the first loan of ₹5 lakh as unexplained, without any cogent justification.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Chennai: No Addition U/s 56(2)(vii) Where Valuation Difference Within 10% Tolerance Band Penalty U/s 270A Deleted – AO Failed to Specify Misreporting Clause ITAT Chennai: Registration u/s 12AB & 80G Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Trust Has Not Yet Started Activities Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) Not Sustainable on Deemed Addition U/s 56(2)(vii)(b) – ITAT Chennai ITAT Chennai: 60% Tax U/s 115BBE Not Applicable for AY 2017-18 Transactions Prior to 01-04-2017 View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031