DCIT Vs Flt Lt. Rajan Dhall Charitable Trust (ITAT Delhi) he issue in the present ground is with respect to the denial of claim of Rs.3.32 crores (rounded off) as application of income on account of provisions for doubtful debts. We find that CIT(A) after considering the submissions of the assessee has given a finding […]...

ITAT held that mere disallowance of depreciation would not lead to imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) , more particularly where quantum disallowance of depreciation itself is highly debatable ...

No mala fide can be inferred where assessee is nursing such huge losses at its disposal. ITAT find that mitigating circumstances exists to exonerate assessee from clutches of penalty under Section 271(1)(b) ...

ITAT Delhi held that Reopening not allowable to disallow prior period expenses which were duly disclosed during original Assessment in Financial Statements and Tax Audit report ...

Difference between MRP & price sold to Stockists, by no stretch of imagination, can be considered as commission or brokerage paid by assessee to its Stockists to attract section 194H TDS....

nce the assessee has initially deposited TDS and furnished Statement in Form 26QB within time, but committed a technical error while depositing TDS resulting in non-grant of TDS to transferor, compelling it to again deposit TDS along-with interest for late deposit, then, in the interests of justice and considering the fact that no loss is...

Jindal Steel & Power Limited Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Delhi) Facts in brief are that the assessing officer has, in the assessment order, while holding the impugned subsidy as revenue receipt, simultaneously reduced the same from cost of fixed assets, while applying provisions of Explanation 10 to section 43(1) of the Act resulting in double...

Electra Paper and Board Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) In the instant case undisputedly on the date of allotment of shares i.e. 31.3.2016, a balance-sheet was drawn by the assessee albeit the said balance sheet was unaudited on that date. The FMV of the shares was determined on the basis of said balance-sheet. The […]...

Grant Thornton Advisory (P.) Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Conclusion: No TDS was to be deducted under section 195 on payment made by assessee to GTIL, UK towards membership and subscription fee as the relationship between GTIL, UK and its members would be governed by the principle of mutuality, hence, would not be taxable. Held: […]...

Jigar Jashwantlal Shah Vs ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Now, we shall deal with the issue of whether section 56(2)(vii)(c) of the Act can be invoked in respect of additional 82,200 shares received by the assessee since the assessee’s wife and father did not exercise the rights issue and renounced the right in favour of the assessee. […]...