ITAT Indore

Appraisal report cannot substitute requirement of recording of satisfaction in case of persons searched

Shri Anil Agarwal Vs ACIT (ITAT Indore)

Shri Anil Agarwal Vs ACIT (ITAT Indore) It has been held that even when the Assessing Officer of the person searched and the other person is common, the Assessing Officer of the person searched has to necessarily form a satisfaction that the item referred to in section 153C belongs or belong to a person other […]...

Read More

ITAT deletes Addition on account of notional interest on interest free advance

Shri John Jacob Vs Jt. CIT (ITAT Indore)

Shri John Jacob Vs JCIT (ITAT Indore) Assessee had produced books of account and audited statements, which proved that the assessee had sufficient surplus in his capital account to give interest free loan. Further that, the AO as well as CIT(A) had not brought anything on record to show that money so advanced was out […]...

Read More

Profits from sale of land with well thought business project is Business Income

Smt. Anita Singh Vs ACIT (ITAT Indore)

Smt. Anita Singh Vs ACIT (ITAT Indore) in the year 2006 itself the assessee along with other persons initiated the process of developing a colony which is proved by the Registration No.40/2006 issued on 21.8.2006. Few months before and the period thereafter all these 18 persons kept on purchasing the land from various land owners and pa...

Read More

ITAT explains taxation of real estate construction contracts (AS-7 & AS-9)

Ashoka Hi-Tech Builders P.Ltd Vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Indore)

Ashoka Hi-Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Indore) In this Case ITAT Indore explains Entire law on taxation of real estate construction contracts  in the context of ‘completed contract’ vs. ‘percentage completion’ with reference to Accounting Standards AS-7 and AS-9 and all important judgements on the issue. I...

Read More

No Addition merely on the Basis of Statements recorded U/s. 133A

Shri Ashok Vani Vs ITO (ITAT Indore)

That, the learned CIT(A) grossly erred, both on facts and in law, in confirming the addition of 77,845/- made by the AO in the appellant's income on allegation of unexplained cash, solely on the basis of statement of the appellant recorded during the course of survey u/s. 133A of the Act, without considering and appreciating the explanati...

Read More

Penalty paid to Stock Exchange allowable as regular business expenditure

ACIT Vs M/s Arihant Capital Markets Ltd. (ITAT Indore)

Assessee made no offence prohibited by law which can be contemplated to be covered under Explanation to section 37 of the Act and, therefore, the payment of penalty made by the assessee to the Stock Exchange is a regular business expenditure and the impugned disallowance has rightly been deleted by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (...

Read More

Purchase cannot become non-genuine for mere payment after 9 months

Shri Omprakash Vs. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Indore)

For the only reason that the payment of purchase has been made after a lapse of 9 months cannot render the purchase as non genuine unless and otherwise any material is brought on record which could negate this...

Read More

CBDT instructions on seizure of jewellery and ornaments are discretionary

Shri Keshav Lila Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-1(2) (ITAT Indore)

Shri Keshav Lila Vs. ACIT (ITAT Indore) CBDT instructions which in our view provides a guideline to the search conducting team that no seizure should be made of the jewellery and ornaments found during the course of search proceedings u/s 132 of the Act, if the same have been duly declared in the wealth tax […]...

Read More

No penalty for disclosure of agricultural income from Ancestral Property in HUF

Income Tax Officer– 2(1) Vs. Narayan Mali (ITAT Indore)

Indore bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer (AO) by considering the fact that the assessee conceded the transaction of Sale of Agricultural Land in the hands of his Hindu Undivided Family (HUF)....

Read More

Demand for short TDS deduction due to wrong quoting of PAN not sustainable if mistake of quoting wrong PAN rectified in revised TDS return

State Bank of Patiala Vs DCIT (ITAT Indore)

Since the mistake of quoting wrong PAN has been rectified in the revised TDS return filed by the assessee which has been accepted by the department, therefore, there is no justification in raising a demand on account of short deduction of TDS....

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (3,934)
Company Law (4,142)
Custom Duty (7,113)
DGFT (3,786)
Excise Duty (4,170)
Fema / RBI (3,547)
Finance (3,748)
Income Tax (28,344)
SEBI (2,982)
Service Tax (3,413)

Featured Posts