Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Section 271AAC

Section 271AAC of the Income Tax Act pertains to the penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income. It imposes a penalty on taxpayers who have deliberately under-reported or misreported their income to evade tax liabilities. The section specifies the amount of penalty and provides guidelines on the imposition and calculation of the penalty. Understanding Section 271AAC is crucial for taxpayers to accurately report their income and comply with tax regulations to avoid penalties and legal consequences. This description provides an overview of Section 271AAC and its implications for under-reporting and misreporting of income under the Income Tax Act.

Latest Articles


FAQs on Penalty provisions under Income Tax Act, 1961

Income Tax : Learn about penalty provisions under the IT Act, including penalties for defaults in tax payment, income reporting, and more. Key ...

August 24, 2024 1827 Views 0 comment Print

CIT(A) given power to levy section 271AAB, 271AAC & 271AAD penalty

Income Tax : It is proposed to amend the sections 271AAB, 271AAC and 271AAD by enabling the Commissioner (Appeals) to levy penalty under these ...

February 2, 2022 6393 Views 0 comment Print

Section 271AAC Penalty in respect of certain specified income

Income Tax : Understand the penalty provisions of Section 271AAC of the Income Tax Act. Learn about the consequences of income determined under...

January 31, 2020 201453 Views 2 comments Print


Latest News


Budget 2024: Time-limit for filing appeals to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Income Tax : Explore amendments to section 253 of Income-tax Act, adjusting time limits for filing appeals to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal...

July 23, 2024 924 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Judiciary


Final assessment order set aside as passed before disposal of rectification application: Karnataka HC

Corporate Law : Karnataka High Court held that since rectification application was filed before passing of final assessment order, DRP ought to ha...

October 1, 2024 222 Views 0 comment Print

Assessee Must Prove Genuineness to Contest Section 68 Addition for Unexplained Cash Deposits During Demonetization

Income Tax : It was held that assessee to provide concrete evidence establishing the genuineness of the cash deposits in accordance with CBDT C...

September 30, 2024 348 Views 0 comment Print

Revisionary Proceedings U/S 263 Justified as AO not verified Unsecured Loan: ITAT Mumbai

Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that invocation of revisionary proceeding u/s. 263 justified as AO was fully ignorant about verification of unsec...

September 26, 2024 252 Views 0 comment Print

Cash deposit in Joint account with other relatives: ITAT deletes addition

Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad rules no tax on cash deposits from relatives if affidavits provided. Sakina Ahmedali Kantavala vs ITO case highligh...

June 13, 2024 717 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT deletes addition of Cash Deposit against Opening Balance during demonetization

Income Tax : Discover why ITAT Jodhpur ruled that cash deposits made by a 77-year-old assesse during demonetization couldn't be added under sec...

May 24, 2024 5412 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Posts in Section 271AAC

Final assessment order set aside as passed before disposal of rectification application: Karnataka HC

October 1, 2024 222 Views 0 comment Print

Karnataka High Court held that since rectification application was filed before passing of final assessment order, DRP ought to have waited till disposal of rectification application. Thus, final assessment order liable to be set aside.

Assessee Must Prove Genuineness to Contest Section 68 Addition for Unexplained Cash Deposits During Demonetization

September 30, 2024 348 Views 0 comment Print

It was held that assessee to provide concrete evidence establishing the genuineness of the cash deposits in accordance with CBDT Circular wherein the various instructions had been issued by CBDT dated 21.2.2017, 3.3.2017, 15.11.2017 & 9.8.2019.

Revisionary Proceedings U/S 263 Justified as AO not verified Unsecured Loan: ITAT Mumbai

September 26, 2024 252 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Mumbai held that invocation of revisionary proceeding u/s. 263 justified as AO was fully ignorant about verification of unsecure loan and addition of 10% unsecured loan by AO was baseless hence assessment order turned out to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue.

FAQs on Penalty provisions under Income Tax Act, 1961

August 24, 2024 1827 Views 0 comment Print

Learn about penalty provisions under the IT Act, including penalties for defaults in tax payment, income reporting, and more. Key FAQs and amounts covered.

Budget 2024: Time-limit for filing appeals to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

July 23, 2024 924 Views 0 comment Print

Explore amendments to section 253 of Income-tax Act, adjusting time limits for filing appeals to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, effective October 2024.

Cash deposit in Joint account with other relatives: ITAT deletes addition

June 13, 2024 717 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Ahmedabad rules no tax on cash deposits from relatives if affidavits provided. Sakina Ahmedali Kantavala vs ITO case highlights proper affidavit usage in tax assessments.

ITAT deletes addition of Cash Deposit against Opening Balance during demonetization

May 24, 2024 5412 Views 0 comment Print

Discover why ITAT Jodhpur ruled that cash deposits made by a 77-year-old assesse during demonetization couldn’t be added under section 68 of the Income Tax Act.

Madras HC Quashes Assessment Order as reasonable time not provided to petitioner

May 12, 2024 831 Views 0 comment Print

Read the full judgment/order of Madras High Court quashing an I-T assessment order adding Rs. 16Cr unexplained expenditure without reasonable time. Portal reopening ordered.

Source of Demonetization Deposits Substantiated: ITAT Deletes Addition

May 5, 2024 1080 Views 0 comment Print

In the case of Pukhraj Nathmal Jain Vs ITO, ITAT Mumbai deletes addition u/s 68 of Income Tax Act, as the source for deposits made during demonetisation period was substantiated.

Section 56(2)(x): Consider Stamp duty value on agreement date – ITAT Kolkata

March 27, 2024 1038 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Kolkata scrutinized the provisions of section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and observed that the AO had not considered the stamp duty valuation of the property on the date of agreement, which was in 2015. As per the proviso to the section, the stamp duty value on the date of agreement should have been taken into account.

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
October 2024
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031