Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Reassessment Itself is Quashed: Mumbai ITAT

Case Law Details

Case Name
Premji Bhurlal Gala Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2013-14
Advertisement Premji Bhurlal Gala Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Reassessment Itself is Quashed- Mumbai ITAT Deletes ₹1.35 Crore Penalty Based on Alleged Cash Loans The Mumbai ITAT deleted penalties levied u/s 271D aggregating to ₹1.35 crore, holding that once the very reassessment proceedings and consequential additions were quashed as void ab initio, the penalty proceedings initiated on the basis of those reassessment orders could not independently survive. The Revenue alleged that the assessee had accepted cash loans from M/s Evergreen Enterprises bas...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,965

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *