Goods and Services Tax : Supreme Court upheld Section 69 GST arrest powers, requiring recorded reasons, CrPC safeguards, CBIC instructions and limiting arr...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court held excise duty paid by buyers formed part of turnover, discussed colourable devices, and distinguished legitim...
Corporate Law : A non-speaking dismissal of an SLP does not affirm the High Court's reasoning or constitute law under Article 141. The doctrine of...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that summoning hotel booking records and call detail records to prove adultery does not violate privacy, a...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court agreed to examine allegations that bank dues were settled at steep discounts through ARCs, while clarifying that...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Corporate Law : SC clarifies limits of High Court's writ powers in IBC cases and recognises Indian CIRP as foreign main proceeding in cross-border...
Corporate Law : Justice BR Gavai sworn in as India's 52nd Chief Justice. Focus areas include addressing case pendency and improving court infrastr...
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Corporate Law : SC held a Ministers statement binds the Government only if it reflects the Governments view and declined to issue speech guideline...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court granted bail under the PMLA, noting prolonged custody, documentary evidence, delayed trial, parity with co-accused, ...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court set aside the High Court's PMLA bail order for failure to apply Section 45 twin conditions and remanded the matter f...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court declined to refer the Article 370 challenge to a larger Bench, holding there was no conflict between earlier Constit...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court upheld termination of a slum redevelopment developer for prolonged delay and reaffirmed the statutory duty and accou...
Corporate Law : The Bill seeks to amend Articles 15 and 16 to allow reservation for backward classes proportionate to their population identified ...
Fema / RBI : RBI directs banks, NBFCs, and other entities to implement Supreme Court’s accessibility guidelines for digital KYC, ensuring inc...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : No restrictions on joint bank accounts or nominations for the queer community, as clarified by the Supreme Court and RBI in August...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court of India introduces new procedures for case adjournments effective 14th February 2024, detailing strict guidelines a...
Supreme Court restored eviction under Section 14(1)(b) DRC Act, holding bank amalgamation transferred tenancy without the landlord’s written consent.
Supreme Court held no valid Section 21 arbitration agreement existed, treated the Chartered Accountants report as a commissioners report and restored the trial.
SC dismissed delayed SLPs on delay and merits, declined to interfere with the High Court order, while keeping the question of law open.
Supreme Court set aside the High Court order, holding that the assessee should pursue the statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act.
Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the challenge to the interest demand was barred after withdrawal of the earlier writ petition.
Supreme Court issued notice, permitted service on respondents’ Standing Counsel and Additional Solicitor General, and listed the matter for 27 July 2026.
SC held that a plaint barred by limitation must be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC when pleadings disclose only an illusory cause of action.
SC held that the remission policy applicable on the date of conviction governs premature release, while Section 433-A and Article 161 operate in distinct fields.
SC upheld the HC ruling that the Will was not genuine, holding that unexplained suspicious circumstances were not dispelled and remand was unwarranted as evidence was sufficient.
SC examined whether formal proof under Section 63 and Section 68 was sufficient and considered whether unexplained suspicious circumstances justified refusal of probate.
