The Companies Act 2013 is a crucial legislation in India governing the incorporation, functioning, and management of companies. Learn about the key provisions, compliance requirements, and legal framework under the Companies Act 2013.
Company Law : The Companies Act, 2013 and related rules now require most public and private companies to issue and transfer securities only in d...
Company Law : The Companies Law Amendment Bill, 2026 proposes major reforms in corporate governance, compliance, and digital regulation. This ar...
Company Law : This guide explains the complete legal procedure for shifting a company’s registered office within the same state but under a di...
Company Law : Section 56 of Companies Act, 2013 requires execution of a proper instrument of transfer for transfer of interest of a member in a ...
Corporate Law : The article explains how digital adjudication systems, virtual hearings, and online compliance platforms are reshaping India’s c...
Company Law : Provisional list of audit firms of listed companies yet to file NFRA-2 for 2023-24. Filing deadline was 30.11.2025; fines apply fo...
Company Law : ICSI recommended restoring public access to basic company master data without mandatory login requirements. The representation sta...
Company Law : NFRA introduced guidelines to evaluate audit firms’ compliance and quality control systems. The framework emphasizes governance,...
Company Law : The issue is ambiguity in filing authority during liquidation. ICSI has requested clarity to enable liquidators to maintain statut...
Company Law : The initiative addresses inefficiencies in the current filing system and proposes consolidation and automation. It highlights a sh...
Income Tax : In a commercial suit regarding specific performance, High Court had allowed a Civil Revision Petition by setting aside the order o...
Company Law : The Madras High Court permitted Nidhi companies to submit fresh replies against NDH-4 rejection orders and directed authorities to...
Company Law : Legal Analysis and Narrative Brief: Dale and Carrington Investment Pvt. Ltd. and Another v. P.K. Prathapan and Others (Supreme Cou...
Company Law : Bombay High Court held that writ petition cannot be entertained in the face of availability of alternative remedy of approaching t...
Company Law : The case examined whether Tribunal approval was required for extending preference share redemption. It was held that such extensio...
Company Law : ROC Pune held that procedural lapses in a private placement involving one investor formed part of a single integrated transaction ...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a start-up company and its officers for delayed filing of e-Form MGT-14 relating to a Special Resolution under ...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for delayed filing of e-Form PAS-3 relating to private placement allotment under Se...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for utilizing private placement funds before filing return of allotment under Secti...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai-II imposed penalty under Section 450 after a company incorrectly mentioned the AGM date in Form AOC-4 XBRL. The order h...
The authority held that financial statements adopted before audit are invalid under the Companies Act. It ruled that failure to file proper statements attracts penalty under Section 137.
The case deals with a 235-day delay in transferring unpaid dividend to the mandated account. The authority imposed penalties, emphasizing strict compliance with statutory timelines under the Companies Act.
ROC imposed heavy penalties for not mentioning directors’ DIN in financial statements. The ruling emphasizes strict compliance with Section 158 requirements under the Companies Act.
The authority imposed penalties as the company failed to maintain a functional registered office for receiving notices. It held that non-receipt of statutory communications constitutes a continuing default under the law.
The authority penalized the company for failing to disclose complete allottee details in statutory returns. The ruling reinforces strict compliance requirements for accurate PAS-3 filings.
ROC imposed penalties for failure to file MGT-14 related to board resolutions approving financial statements. The ruling highlights strict compliance requirements under Section 117(2) of the Companies Act.
Authorities imposed penalties due to failure to disclose complete allottee details in PAS-3. The case highlights strict compliance requirements under allotment rules and consequences of incomplete filings.
The case addresses non-disclosure of allottee details in statutory filings, leading to regulatory action. The authority imposed penalties for violating disclosure rules and emphasized strict compliance with filing requirements.
The article highlights that trademark conflicts remain a major reason for rejection even when MCA auto-check shows no issue. It emphasizes the need for independent verification and proper NOC documentation.
The issue involved auditor independence concerns arising from network relationships and control weaknesses. The report highlights the need for strict compliance with independence provisions and stronger internal controls.
