Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
NCLT Mumbai rejects Parekh Aluminex liquidator’s request for private sale of asset significantly below reserve price. Orders Swiss Challenge auction to maximise value. Cites IBC regulations & NCLAT.
IBBI Appellate Authority upholds 6-month suspension of Registered Valuer Nitin Ashok Garg, citing deficiencies in his liquidation valuation report concerning sources of information & standards used.
IBBI First Appellate Authority dismisses multiple RTI appeals, citing repetitive and overlapping requests as abuse of the Act, warns appellant.
Bombay High Court held that mere delay in filing application for recall or review, not involving latches, acquiescence or estoppel, would not prevent this Court from exercising inherent power of recalling its order.
Anup Kumar Singh Vs Union of India & others (Calcutta High Court) Calcutta High Court held that issuance of provisional seizure order under Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 [FEMA] is in complete disregard of the moratorium prescribed by section 33(5) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] since the provisions of the IBC would override the […]
NCLAT Chennai rejects M.K. Rajagopalan’s appeal against the approval of S. Rajendran’s resolution plan for Vasan Health Care, citing lack of locus standi as an unsuccessful applicant.
NCLT rejects CIRP Initiation as Notice sent to incorrect address, default amounts falling within the Section 10-A period, the incorrect calculation and omission of interest in the demand notice
NCLT Chennai rules that the ₹1 crore threshold for initiating insolvency proceedings against a corporate debtor also applies to their personal guarantors under IBC.
NCLAT Delhi held that no default falling within the prohibited period of Section 10A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code can form basis for initiating CIRP. Accordingly, section 9 application rightly rejected.
NCLAT Delhi held that application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] is not maintainable due to pre-existing dispute between the parties. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
