Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
NCLAT upholds NCLT’s rejection of Indian Bank’s insolvency plea against a personal guarantor who was also the resolution applicant, citing the approval of a new guarantee under the corporate debtor’s resolution plan.
Section 34 of IBC governs liquidator appointment, consent requirements, transfer of management powers, personnel cooperation, and conditions for liquidator replacement and fee structure.
Understand Section 33 of IBC, detailing when and how corporate debtor liquidation is initiated, role of NCLT and CoC, legal implications and employee status.
NCLAT Delhi held that status quo order by forcing corporate debtor to restore liquidator amounts to stalling the voluntary liquidation process. Thus, adjudicating authority cannot restore status quo under voluntary liquidation process.
IBBI withdraws Form IP-1 for all IBC processes from July 14, 2025, following introduction of revised reporting framework and electronic Assignment Module.
Adjudicating authority also in its order dated 03.12.2024, while considering the application filed by the RP for approval of the resolution plan has noticed all relevant facts, including the financial outlay and four contingencies as part of the resolution plan.
The Appellant submitted that, despite repeated follow-ups, the Respondent has failed to pay the outstanding balance. The Appellant issued a notice under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking recovery of the said dues.
Section 44 of the IBC outlines NCLT’s powers to reverse preferential transactions, restore assets, and protect good-faith third parties in insolvency proceedings.
NCLAT Delhi held that delay in filing restoration appeal can be condoned in terms of rule 48 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 since sufficient cause made out. Accordingly, matter restored back to the Adjudicating Authority.
Understand the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code’s provisions for minimum payments to operational and dissenting financial creditors, including key amendments and the ongoing Supreme Court deliberation on secured creditor entitlements.
