Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajesh Alfred Vs Ketsaal Retail LLP (NCLAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : NCLAT
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Rajesh Alfred Vs Ketsaal Retail LLP (NCLAT Delhi) NCLAT Delhi held that the capital investment under the reseller agreement lacks the essential ingredients of financial debt under Section 5(8) (f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Accordingly, dismissal of petition u/s. 7 for CIRP justified. Facts- The present appeal has been filed u/s. 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (Adjudicating Authority). The said petition under Section 7 of the Code was filed by the Appellant – Rajesh Alfred sole Proprietor of M/S Anand Enterprises, se...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031