Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
After the introduction of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), Corporate Debtor, Resolution professionals were facing several issues, this involves meeting various statutory compliance requirements for which the management of the corporate debtor was responsible prior to commencement of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) which includes periodic Compliances also.
The IBBI had issued on 27th August, 2020, the SCN to Mr. Kamal Garg for accepting the assignment of the voluntary liquidation of UAS International Trip Support Private Limited (CD) after 31st December 2019 without holding a valid Authorisation for Assignment (AFA) from his IPA. The public announcement was made on 12th January 2020. The […]
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code has been introduced with an object of maximization of the value of the assets, promote entrepreneurship ,availability of credit, resolution of insolvency within the time bound manner balance the interest of all stakeholders including alteration of priority of payments to the Govt are some of the objects of the code. […]
Kiran Gupta Vs State Bank of India & Anr. (Delhi high Court) Whether a Bank/Financial Institution can institute or continue with proceedings against a Guarantor under the SARFAESI Act, when proceedings under the IBC have been initiated against the Principal Borrower & the same are pending adjudication? Section 128 of the Contract Act provides that […]
In the present matter it is observed that, Mr. Rajagopal had provided his consent to accept the assignment in Form-2 to Indian Overseas Bank on 01.03.2019 prior to the amendment made to IP regulation for CIRP of Coastal Energy Private Limited, before 31st December, 2019. However, it is observed that the date of commencement of […]
(i) Mr. Kamalesh Kumar Singhania shall undergo pre-registration educational course from the IPA of which he is a member. (ii) Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Singhania shall not take any new assignment/ process under the Code without compliance of the above direction.
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code) provides a market process, popularly known as called corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP), for time bound revival of viable corporate debtors (CD) and closure of unviable ones.
(1) These Regulations may be called the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) (Fourth Amendment) Regulations, 2020. (2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
These regulations may be called the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) (Fifth Amendment) Regulations, 2020.They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
(1) These regulations may be called the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Information Utilities) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020. (2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
