Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
Shri Jayanti Prasad took charge as Whole-time Member of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India in New Delhi today.
The disciplinary proceedings shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Inspection and Investigation) Regulations, 2017.
These regulations may be called the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professionals) (Amendment) Regulations, 2022.
The Madras High Court rules that IBC proceedings cannot affect the rights of the Income Tax Department to reopen assessments.
UCO Bank Vs GIT Textiles Manufacturing Limited (NCLT Kolkata) Corporate Debtor contended that the instant petition is barred by limitation. It can be seen that the date of default is mentioned to be 30.09.2012 i.e the date on which the account became NPA. Accordingly, the limitation period for filing the application would ordinarily end on […]
NCLT, Kolkata Bench, ruled that a guarantor who repays a principal borrower’s debt can initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against them.
It is further declared by the Hon’ble Supreme Court that all claims not part of the resolution plan, shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect to a claim, which is not part of the resolution plan.
Petitioner states that impugned order and consequential notices of demand and penalty raising a demand of income tax amounting to Rs. 48 crores are in complete contravention of the order passed by NCLT
Explore the NCLT Mumbai order in Divyesh Desai case against DCIT Mumbai, directing the refund of TDS totaling Rs. 93,81,464 to the Corporate Debtor Company.
IBBI held that Mr. Yogesh Kumar Gupta had violated the provisions of the Code and regulations by deciding to remove the CoC members from the list of CoC and revise their voting share on the basis that some CoC members have not contributed to the CIRP cost, and stating before the CoC that no approval […]
