Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
Sunil Kumar Jian and Others Vs Sundaresh Bhatt and Others (Supreme Court) Whether the amounts of provident fund, gratuity, and pension fund should be separated from the liquidation and other rights of workmen in liquidation process The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sunil Kumar Jian and Others v. Sundaresh Bhatt and Others (decided […]
Twinkle Enviro Tech Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) At the outset, we find that assessee’s case has been referred to Hon’ble National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) for Insolvency Resolution Process and an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) has been appointed in the assessee company. In view of the order passed by the Hon’ble NCLT, we […]
NCLT held that IBC does not protect the interest or claim of a Partner against another Partner or the Partnership Firm.
Since the petitioners are having effective and statutory remedy before the Appellate Authority, they cannot come to this Court invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated against Trident Sugars Ltd. and had appointed Mr. Medi Yadaiah as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) as the Corporate Debtor had neither paid the balance amount nor raised any dispute in respect of the quantity or the amount at any point of time.
Sale of Corporate Debtor as a Going Concern as is where is basis under Regulation 32 A of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 and the Code means sale of assets as well as liabilities and not assets sans liabilities.
Held that conclusion of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Plan against principal debtor does not bar Financial Creditor against Personal Guarantor. Accordingly, personal guarantor declared insolvent and insolvency resolution process initiated against him.
These regulations may be called the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Employees’ Service) (Amendment) Regulations, 2022.
It is observed that in accordance with the regulation 36 of the CIRP Regulations, Mr. Gupta has not mentioned the amount of claims, voting share, details of security interest, date of acquisition, cost of acquisition, remaining useful life, identification number, depreciation charged, book value, and any other relevant details related to assets, as on the […]
IBBI held that in view of the submission made by Mr. Sunil Kumar Agarwal, and materials available on record, DC notes that Mr. Sunil Kumar Agarwal has erred on all counts as detailed above. Be it related to filling of avoidance application; appointment of valuers or related to publication announcements, the responses are not as […]
