Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the CoC may decide to liquidate a corporate debtor under Section 33(2) before inviting resolution plans, with limi...
Corporate Law : This article explains why the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code places commercial decision-making in the hands of the Committee of Cr...
Corporate Law : The article explains how the NCLAT interpreted Section 66(1) to extend liability beyond company insiders to third parties who know...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that individuals investing for financial returns rather than home ownership cannot invoke Section 7 of the ...
Corporate Law : The High Court held that a company cannot shift its registered office after approval of a resolution plan when appeals against the...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh ...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held that Section 14 IBC moratorium does not prevent deemed conveyance under Section 11 MOFA and restored the society's ...
Company Law : Kerala HC held Rule 55 empowers NCLT to accept additional pleadings, setting aside refusal to entertain further objections in a Se...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that a Section 7 IBC application can proceed despite pending winding-up proceedings where no irreversible stage...
Corporate Law : NCLT admitted the Section 9 petition after holding that campaign-related emails did not constitute a genuine pre-existing dispute....
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee found that the Resolution Professional delayed admission of a financial creditor's claim and failed to ...
Corporate Law : The Disciplinary Committee imposed a two-year suspension after finding failures in claim verification, unauthorized financial deci...
Before the initiation of PPIRP, the Corporate Debtor has to present the base resolution plan to the financial creditors. It could come from promoters if they are eligible under section 29A of the IBC.
TATA Consultancy Services Limited Vs Vishal Ghisulal Jain (Supreme Court) Facts- The appellant and the Corporate Debtor entered into a Build Phase Agreement followed by a Facilities Agreement. The Facilities Agreement obligated the Corporate Debtor to provide premises with certain specifications and facilities to the appellant for conducting examinations for educational institutions. Later, a termination […]
Mr. Sandip Garg took charge as Executive Director, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) in New Delhi today. Immediately before joining IBBI, he was serving as Commissioner (Exemptions), Income Tax, Pune.
INTRODUCTION Section 60 (5) of the Insolvency and the Bankruptcy Code, 2016, talks about the jurisdiction of NCLT to dispose of the matters related to the insolvency concerning the corporate debtor. However, there are other provisions in the code that appears to contradict the provision given under section 60 (5). This issue again came into […]
Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under section 7 and 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 can be maintained even if Company’s name has been struck off by the Registrar of Companies (ROC).
Whether the High Court ought to interfere, under Article 226/227 of the Constitution, with an Order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal in a proceeding under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 , ignoring the availability of a statutory remedy of appeal to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal and if so, under what circumstances?
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) is silent on determining a mechanism for adjudication of disputed claims. There is no provision regarding the appropriate authority which would exercise adjudicatory functions to adjudicate the disputed claims. Whether Adjudicating Authority would be an Adjudicator of disputed claim is not clear under IBC. Section 60(5) of the […]
Clarification regarding requirement of seeking No Objection Certificate or No Dues Certificate from the Income Tax Department during Voluntary Liquidation Process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code).
ATE Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs Rajasthan Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (NCLT Jaipur) A ‘Government Company’ as defined under Section 2(45) of the Companies Act, 2013 is covered under the definition of a ‘Company’ as defined under Section 2(20) of Companies Act 2013. Since the Corporate Debtor, has not been performing any Governmental Functions or the […]
We believe that the framework for measuring outcomes of the IBC recommended by this Working Group would help researchers and policy makers to appreciate the nuances involved in evaluating the outcomes of this new law and guide them to adopt a holistic approach instead of approaching the issue on a piecemeal basis.
