Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
Read about the notification issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, exempting specific transactions from the provisions of Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The exemptions include Production Sharing Contracts, Revenue Sharing Contracts, Exploration Licenses, Mining Leases, and related transactions.
Learn about the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal’s (NCLAT) power to recall judgments. Recent rulings clarify that while NCLAT cannot review its judgments, it can use inherent powers under Rule 11 of NCLAT Rules, 2016, to recall judgments in case of procedural errors. Explore the nuances of this legal power and the distinction between review and recall. Stay informed on the latest legal developments.
Insolvency and bankruptcy are related but distinct concepts in the field of financial distress and debt resolution. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) of 2016, enacted in India, provides a comprehensive framework for dealing with insolvency and bankruptcy matters.
NCLAT approves Kuldeep Singh & Anr’s private sale against Sainsons Pulp and Papers Ltd. liquidator, highlighting full payment with interest after initial delay.
IBBI Disciplinary Committee has issued an order addressing the contravention by Mr. Raj Kumar Ralhan, an Insolvency Professional. The order pertains to violations under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and related regulations, including the incurrence of unreasonable costs during liquidation and the failure to make necessary disclosures regarding engaged professionals. The IBBI Disciplinary Committee’s order […]
On the date of approval of Resolution Plan by Adjudicating Authority, all such claims which are not a part of Resolution Plan, shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect to a claim which is not a part of the Resolution Plan.
Law is well-settled that with the finalization of insolvency resolution plan and the approval thereof by the NCLT, all dues of creditors, Corporate, Statutory and others stand extinguished and no demand can be raised for the period prior to the specified date.
NCLAT Chennai held that condonation in filing of claim under Form-C based on bald explanation without sufficient cause for the delay is not allowable.
NCLAT held that that the Adjudicating Authority rightly rejected the Resolution plan as the same didn’t complied with the provisions of Section 29A(G) read with Section 240A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Detailed review of NCLAT judgment in H S Oberoi Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. Vs Inderjit Singh & Anr., highlighting importance of principle of natural justice in passing orders
