Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
ITAT Delhi’s ruling in UM Green Lighting P. Ltd vs DCIT emphasizes the supremacy of NCLT’s moratorium under IBC over tribunal proceedings, halting the Revenue’s case during the moratorium period, and underscoring the IBC’s overriding effect.
The objective of this paper is to analyze the developments related to the insolvency of personal guarantors to corporate debtors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Examine the recent NCLAT Delhi verdict in the UTI Employees Sai Samruddhi Cooperative Housing Society Vs PNB Housing Finance Ltd. & Ors. case, emphasizing the significance of allowing objections in resolution plans.
IBBI Disciplinary Committee found that Mr. C. Ramasubramaniam contravened provisions of IBC and related regulations. Firstly, he failed to file an extension application within the prescribed timeframe after the expiry of the liquidation period. This neglect in fulfilling his duty as a Liquidator demonstrates gross negligence and dereliction of responsibilities. Secondly, Mr. Ramasubramaniam accepted an […]
Delve into the complexities of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, exploring its objectives, mechanisms, and the principle of allocative efficiency. Assess the success and failures of IBC & CIRP, analyzing their impact on debt recovery, credit availability, stakeholder interests, and entrepreneurship. Uncover the real-world numbers, revealing challenges and opportunities in the quest for efficient corporate insolvency resolution in India.
NCLT has granted approval to Ace Infracity Developers for their resolution plan to acquire debt-ridden 3C Homes. Read details of approved plan, including provisions for compensation, possession of residential plots, and compliance with IBC.
Jupiter Wagons Ltd (JWL) receives approval from Kolkata National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) for its resolution plan to acquire a controlling stake in Stone India.
NCLAT Chennai held that as the Application for MSME certificate was made after the commencement of CIRP, such unauthorized Application cannot be considered and cannot tide over ineligibility under Section 29-A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
CESTAT Mumbai held that from the date of approval of the resolution plan by the NCLT, the appeal filed by the applicant has abated and CESTAT has become functus officio in the matters relating to this appeal
NCLAT’s decision to end the CIRP against Bhagwandas R. Bhattad, following their complete payment of the principal amount and interest
