Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that liabilities arising from corporate guarantees qualify as financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Inso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court ruled that a shortfall payment clause in a Deed of Hypothecation can qualify as a contract of guarantee under th...
Corporate Law : The article examines how conflicting Supreme Court judgments in Rainbow Papers and Raman Ispat created uncertainty regarding the s...
Corporate Law : The IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026 introduces CIIRP as a faster and proactive insolvency mechanism for early-stage financial stress. Th...
Corporate Law : Explains how the Court held that insolvency proceedings cannot be used as a pressure tactic for debt recovery. Even if default is ...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : NCLT Indore held that dissolution under Section 54 of the IBC was justified after all assets of the corporate debtor were liquidat...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that ongoing One-Time Settlement discussions cannot defeat insolvency proceedings when debt and default are admit...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : Tribunal noted that the CIRP period, including all extensions, had reached 741 days and expired on 20 November 2025. Since no plan...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Mumbai held that liquidation became mandatory under Section 33(2) of the IBC after the Committee of Creditors rejected al...
Corporate Law : The amendment bars related parties, recent auditors, and connected persons from acting as registered valuers in pre-pack insolvenc...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016 to allow appointment of one registered valuer for each asset class in M...
Corporate Law : The IBBI amended the CIRP Regulations, 2016 to permit appointment of one set of registered valuers for MSME corporate debtors. The...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Amendment Regulations, 2026 introduce nominee directors on IPA governing boards and strengthen oversight mechanisms. The ...
Corporate Law : The order highlights that delayed applications, late progress reports, and non-compliance with filing requirements amounted to ser...
Explore interplay between Article 137 of Limitation Act and Section 238 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). Learn how statutory limitations impact insolvency proceedings.
Supreme Court held that a successful resolution applicant cannot be faced with undecided claims after the resolution plan has been accepted. Accordingly, claim filed after resolution plan accepted by CoC untenable.
Explore the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) 2nd Amendment Regulations 2023. Learn about important changes and their impact on insolvency professionals.
In present facts of the case, Petitioner has been engaged in the business of marketing and manufacturing of footwear and fashion products and is the first user and proprietor of well-known trademark ‘LIBERTY’. On 01.04.2001, Petitioner and Respondent entered into a Registered User Agreement in respect of trademark ‘LIBERTY’ in Class 25 for a period of three years.
Explore Supreme Court’s recent ruling on Section 66 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, highlighting its limitations in providing remedies against third parties.
Read full text of NCLAT Chennai order in case of Malavika Hegde vs. IndusInd Bank, where a settlement led to termination of CIRP proceedings.
NCLT Ahmedabad approved the resolution plan submitted by M/s. GCCL Infrastructure and Projects Limited (Corporate Debtor) as resolution plan has provisions of its effective implementation.
NCLAT Chennai held that any kind of settlement is between the Parties and no settlement can be directed by way of an Order under the Provisions of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC, 2016).
DC notes that Mr. Partha Sarathy Sarkar has conducted the entire CIRP of the CD in a brazen manner without having due regard the provisions of the Code and the regulations made thereunder. Keeping in view the grave nature of contraventions as detailed above, three years suspension is fully justified.
GST and Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code have almost a contemporary beginning. GST Laws (as also other tax laws) are being synced with IBC. Nevertheless, overriding effect of IBC over other laws is obvious.
